SYNTACTIC FIELD “MENTAL ACTIVITY” IN THE SPEECH OF JUNIOR STUDENTS
Author:
Elena V.Tarasenko
Affiliation:
Taganrog State Pedagogical Institute named after A.P. Chekhov
Abstract:
This article analyzes the total of structural diagrams of a simple sentence as a representative of the syntactic concept MENTAL ACTIVITY in the language world view of a junior student. In the focus of our research is the implementation of regular schemes (typical propositions) established through field analysis as signs of a dominant cognitive syntactic concept.
As objectified in block diagrams the syntactic field of the concept MENTAL ACTIVITY forms the core and the periphery. The center of the nucleus is represented by special schemes that are recurrent in the speech implementation. The other structural schemes of a simple sentence demonstrate the productivity of the main features of the represented categories at different distances from the center.
Block diagrams of a simple sentence represent the syntactic concept MENTAL ACTIVITY as a three-component entity. The first constitutive component – the predicate – in its morphological nature is characterized by homogeneity. It is represented by the personal verb lexical-grammatical group of "mental activity" or by the infinitive. The subject, the second component of the selected block diagrams –
a carrier status, – is represented mainly by an anthroponym or Causator. The third component is the prepositional-case noun word form with the value of the object relationship or knowledge.
In speech a simple sentence is exposed to grammatical modifications, enriching the proposition.
Thus, the allocated block diagrams in the field of stratification of the syntactic concept MENTAL ACTIVITY show the core and the periphery, highlighting the cognitive symptoms such as anth-ropocentricity, phase, negation, temporality, and implementing a language world view of junior students.
The developed approach may be used in linguodidactics in order to determine the extent of the knowledge of the subject, the volume of the memory, emotional and psychological background of a lan-guage person in ontogenesis.
Keywords:
syntactic concept, modification of the structural scheme, a junior student
References:
Agleeva, Z.R. Semanticheskaya set' – sintaksicheskiy kontsept – freym. Frazeologiya i kognitivistika. V.I. Idiomatika i poznanie. Belgorod: BGU, 2008, pp. 249-253.
Arutyunova, N.D. Tipy yazykovykh znacheniy. Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt. Moscow, 1988.
Bulygina, M.M. Glagol'naya kauzatsiya dina-miki sintaksicheskogo kontsepta (na materiale russkikh i angliyskikh leksiko-semanticheskikh grupp glagolov peremeshcheniya ob"ekta). Voronezh: VGU, 2004.
Volokhina, G.A., Popova, Z.D. Sintaksicheskie kontsepty russkogo prostogo predlozheniya. Voronezh, 1999.
Gumbol'dt ,V. fon. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu: Translated from German, Eds. G.V. Ramishvili; poslesl. A.V. Gulygi i V.A. Zvegintseva. Moscow: OAO IG «Progress», 2000.
Zimnyaya, I.A. Lingvopsikhologiya rechevoy deyatel'nosti. Moscow; Voronezh, 2001.
Zolotova, G.A. Kommunikativnye aspekty russkogo sintaksisa. Moscow: Nauka, 1982.
Kazarina, V.I. Sintaksicheskie kontsept «sostoyanie» v sovremennom russkom yazyke (K voprosu o ego formirovanii). Elets: EGU, 2002.
Kazarina, V.I. Sovremennyy russkiy sintaksis. Struktura organizatsii prostogo predlozheniya: uchebnoe posobie. Elets, 2007.
Lomov, A.M. Tipologiya russkogo predlozheniya. Voronezh: VGU, 1994.
Malashchenko, V.P. Leksiko-sintaksicheskaya baza modeli (strukturno-semanticheskoy osnovy) predlozheniya. Leksiko-grammaticheskie vzaimodeystviya v sisteme sintaksicheskikh edinits. Rostov n/D, 1991, pp. 315-323.
Novozhenova, Z.L. Russkoe glagol'noe predlozhenie: struktura i semantika: dis. d-ra filol. nauk. Saratov, 2001.
Peshekhonova, N.A. Funktsionirovanie strukturnoy skhemy prostogo predlozheniya «kto sozdaet chto» v tekste. Problemy russkogo i obshchego yazykoznaniya. Elets: EGU, 2006, no.4, pp. 100-107.
Plotkin, V.Ya. Semantika i sintaksis predlozheniya i vyskazyvaniya. Sintaksicheskaya i leksicheskaya semantika na materiale raznykh yazykov. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986, pp. 33-43.
Pokrovskaya, E.A. Russkiy sintaksis v XX veke: lingvokul'turologicheskiy analiz. Rostov n/D: Izd-vo Rost. un-ta, 2000.
Popova, Z.D. Sintaksicheskaya sistema russkogo yazyka v svete teorii sintaksicheskikh kontseptov. Voronezh: VGU, 2009.
Popova, Z.D., Sternin, I.A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika. Moscow: AST: Vostok-Zapad, 2007.
Popova, Z.D. Obshchee yazykoznanie. Voronezh: VGU, 1987.
Fedorov, V.A. Frantsuzskie strukturnye skhemy s glagolami avoir i ikh perevod na russkiy yazyk. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya, 2006, no.1, pp. 104-115.
Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. Moscow, 2004.
Furs, L.A. Sintaksicheski reprezentiruemye kontsepty: dis. d-ra filol. nauk. Tambov, 2004.
Tseytlin, S.N. Sintaksicheskie modeli so znacheniem psikhicheskogo sostoyaniya i ikh sinonimy. Sintaksis i stilistika. Moscow: Nauka, 1976.
Goddar, K., & Wierzbicka, А. (1995). Key words, culture and cognition. Philosophica, 55(1), 37-67.
Pages:
140-147
