Author: N.P. Savoiskaya
Affiliation: University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Abstract:
Keywords: lexical concept, cognitive model, geometrical scheme, Quantitative Multifactorial method, grammatical construction
References:
Baranov A.N. Kognitivnaya teoriya metafory': pochti dvadcat' pyat' let spustya // Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory', kotory'mi my' zhivem: per. s angl. / pod red. i s predisl. A.N. Baranova. 2-e. izd. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2008. S. 7-21.
Abbot-Smith K., Tomasello M. Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based ac-count of syntactic acquisition // The Linguistic Review. 2006. № 23. P. 275-290.
Baker P. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London; N.Y.: Continuum, 2006.
Barlow M., Kemmer S. (eds). Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2000.
Besedina N. Evaluation through Morphol-ogy: A Cognitive Perspective // Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings. 2012. Vol. 1. P. 177-192. URL: http://uk-cla.org.uk/proceed-ings
Biber D., Conrad S. and Rippen R. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Chilton P. Discourse Space Theory: Geo-metry, brain and shifting viewpoints // Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics. 2005. № 3. P. 78-116.
Chilton P. Geometrical concepts at the inter-face of formal and cognitive models: Aktionsart, aspect and the English progressive // Pragmatics and Cognition. 2007. № 15 (1). P. 91-114.
Chilton P. Get and the grasp schema. A new approach to conceptual modeling in image schema semantics // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, V. Evans & S. Pourcel (eds). Amster-dam/Phila-delphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. 2009. № 24. P. 331-370.
Colleman T. Beyond the dative alternation: The semantics of the Dutch aan-Dative // Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: corpus-driven approaches. D. Glynn & K. Fischer (eds). Berlin/N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 2010. P. 271-304.
Dabrowska E. Words as constructions // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. V. Evans
& S. Pourcel (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. 2009. № 24. P. 201-224.
Divjak D. Corpus-based evidence for an idiosyncratic aspect-modality relation in Russian // Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: corpus-driven approaches. D. Glynn & K. Fischer (eds). Berlin/N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 2010. P. 305-332.
Evans V. & Green M. Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
Evans V. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguis-tics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.
Evans V. Semantic representation in LCCM Theory // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. V. Evans & S. Pourcel (eds). Ams-terdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. 2009. № 24.
P. 27-56.
Fischer K. Quantitative Methods in Cogni-tive Semantics. Introduction to the volume // Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: corpus-driven approaches. D. Glynn & K. Fischer (eds). Berlin/N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 2010. P. 43-59.
Fuhs St. The aspectual coercion of the English Durative Adverbial // Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: corpus-driven ap-proaches. D. Glynn & K. Fischer (eds). Berlin/N.Y: Walter de Gruyter, 2010. P. 137-154.
Glynn D. Polysemy, syntax, and variation.
A usage-based method for Cognitive Semantics // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. V. Evans
& S. Pourcel (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. 2009. № 24. P. 77-104.
Glynn D. Corpus-driven Cognitive Seman-tics. Introduction to the field // Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: corpus-driven approaches.
D. Glynn & Fischer K. (eds). Berlin/N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 2010. P. 1-42.
Gries St. Th. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: The Case of Particle Place-ment. London: Continuum, 2003.
Gries St. Th. Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: The many meanings of to run // Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. St. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. P. 57-99.
Gries St. Th., Divjak D. Behavioural pro-files: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analys-is // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. V. Evans & S. Pourcel (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. 2009. № 24. P. 57-76.
Hunston, S. Corpus Approaches to Evalua-tion. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. Routledge. N.Y.; London, 2011.
Langacker R. Constructions and construc-tional meaning // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. V. Evans & S. Pourcel (eds). Amster-dam/Philadel-phia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. 2009.
№ 24. P. 225-268.
McIntyre A. The semantic and syntactic de-composition of get: An interaction between verb meaning and particle placement // Journal of Semantics. 2005. № 2. P. 401-438.
Moravcsik E. A. Patronomic structures in syntax // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. V. Evans
& S. Pourcel (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. 2009. № 24. P. 269-288.
Taboada M., Carretero M. & Hinnel J. Loving and hating the movies in English, German and Spanish. URL: http://www.sfu.ca/~mtaboada/research/ pubs.html
Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2000.
Tomasello M. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cam-bridge, MA & London, UK: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Tremblay A., Derwing B., Libben G. & Westbry C. Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence From Self-Paced reading and Sentence Recall tasks // Language Learning. № 61:2. June 2011. P. 569-613. © 2011 Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00622.x
Zeschel A. What’s (in) a construction? Com-plete inheritance vs. full-entry models // New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. V. Evans & S. Pourcel (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company. 2009. № 24. P. 185-200.
Zeschel A. Exemplars and analogy: Semantic extension in constructional networks // Quan-titative methods in cognitive semantics: corpus-driven approaches. D. Glynn & K. Fischer (eds). Berlin/N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 2010. P. 201-222.
Zwarts J. Vectors across spacial domains: From place to size, orientation, shape, and parts. In Representing Direction in Language and Space.
E. van der Zee & J. Slack (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. P. 39-68.
Zwarts J. & Winter Y. Vector space seman-tics: A model-theoretic account of locative pre-positions // Journal of Logic, Language and In-formation. 2000. № 9 (2). P. 171-213.
Wit A. de, Brisard F. A Cognitive Grammar account of the semantics of the English present progressive // Journal of Linguistics. Available on CJO 2013 doi: 10.1017/S0022226713000169.
Pages: 83-89