Tambov
Русский English
All-Russian academic journal
“Issues of Cognitive Linguistics”

ORDINARY PHILOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE TEXT OF THE LAW AS A COMPONENT OF LEGAL COMMUNICATION: THE LINGUIST’S VIEW

ORDINARY PHILOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE TEXT OF THE LAW AS A COMPONENT OF LEGAL COMMUNICATION: THE LINGUIST’S VIEW


Author:  N.D. Golev

Affiliation:  Kemerovo State University

Abstract: 

The article deals with the methodological aspects of the legal concept “philological interpretation of the text of the law”, an important component of legal communication. The author discovers and interprets inner contradictions of this concept derived from the different content of legal concepts such as “language”, “legal language”, “text”, “text of the law”, “interpretation”, “norm” and linguistic concepts, which sum up the meta-language experience of native speakers (law-abiding citizens). 
The ontological and mental contradictions manifest themselves in the attitude towards organization and functioning of the legal language, in the ideas about the subjective character of the communicative act (author / addressee), significance of its particular components (illocution / locution / perlocution) and independence of the text from the author, about the role of the subjects of official and unofficial interpretation in legal communication. 
The author proves the importance of a regular philological interpretation for legal communication and the necessity of studying it in legal linguistics. 
In conclusion the author discusses the possibilities of the contradictions functional decreasing provides for strengthening the effective character of legal communication.

Keywords:  text of the law, legal communication, ordinary philological interpretation, ordinary meta-language consciousness, legal linguistics, linguistic jurisprudence, legal language.

References: 
Arkhipov, S.I. (2008). Ponyatiepravovoykommunikatsii. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 6, 7-17.
Barabash, O.V. (2013). K probleme tolkovaniya pravovykh dokumentov: antikorruptsionnyy aspect. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 3, 209-214. 
Bart, R. (1989). Smert' avtora. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika: transl. (pp. 384-391). Moscow: Progress.
Belokon', N.V. (2011). Sootnoshenie metodov lingvisticheskogo i yuridicheskogo analiza pri ispol'zovanii grammaticheskogo sposoba tolkovaniya kak sredstvo ustraneniya neopredelennosti v ponimanii polozheniy konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 8, 31-35.
Belonosov, V.O. Razvitie protsessa tolkovaniya norm ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. URL: http://www.iuaj.net/node/410 
Belyaeva, O.M. (2010). Ob"ekt tolkovaniya prava: volya zakona («bukva» zakona) ili volya zakono-datelya («dukh» zakona)? Zakony Rossii: opyt analiz, praktika. Kazanskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. V.I. Ul'yanova-Lenina, 11, 104-108. 
Bondar', N.S. (2013). Bukva i dukh rossiyskoy Konstitutsii: 20-letniy opyt garmonizatsii v svete konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 11, 5-17.
Borovkova, M.V. (2010). Lingvostilisticheskiy status tekstov yuridicheskoy interpretatsii i yuridicheskogo tolkovaniya (na materiale russkoyazychnykh i nemetskoyazychnykh tekstov). Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ekaterinburgskoy akademii sovremennogo iskusstva. 
Bosov, A.E. (2011). «Printsip ponyatnosti» i leksicheskie trudnosti ego realizatsii pri postanovke voprosov pered prisyazhnymi zasedatelyami. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 3, 80-82.
Vandyshev, V.V. (2012). Vliyanie yazykoznaniya (lingvistiki) na soderzhanie otechestvennykh zakonov (obshchie polozheniya). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoy yuridicheskoy akademii, 2(15), 95-101.
Vashchenko, Yu.S. (2002). Filologicheskoe tolkovanie norm prava. Tol'yatti: Volzh. un-t im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 
Velikiy, D.P. (2011). Grammaticheskiy sposob tolkovaniya v ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave. Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) Moskovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii, 13, 68-77. 
Volosov, M.E. (1999). Autentichnyy (autenticheskiy). In Rossiyskaya yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya (pp. 65-66). Moscow. 
Vorob'eva, M.E. (2010). Funktsionirovanie yuridicheskikh terminov v obydennom soznanii (na materiale semasiologicheskogo eksperimenta). In Yurislingvistika-10: Lingvokonfliktologiya i yurisprudentsiya: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov (pp. 445-453). Kemerovo; Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta. 
Golev, N.D. (2002). Ob ob"ektivnosti i legitimnosti istochnikov lingvisticheskoy ekspertizy. In Yurislingvistika-3: problemy yurislingvisticheskoy ekspertizy (pp. 14-29). Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta. 
Golev, N.D. (2006). Pravovaya kommunikatsiya v zerkale estestvennogo yazyka. In Yurislingvistika-7: Russkiy yazyk kak fenomen pravovoy kommunikatsii (pp. 8-38). Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta. 
Golev, N.D. (2007). Lingvisticheskie tupiki yuridicheskoy tekhniki. In Yurislingvistika-8: russkiy yazyk i sovremennoe rossiyskoe pravo: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov (pp. 92-104). Kemerovo; Barnaul. 
Golev, N.D. (2009). Sovremennoe rossiyskoe obydennoe metayazykovoe soznanie mezhdu naukoy i shkol'nym kursom russkogo yazyka («pravil'nost'» kak bazovyy postulat naivnoy lingvistiki). In Obydennoe metayazykovoe soznanie: ontologicheskiy i gnoseologicheskiy aspekty. Ch. II: kollektivnaya monografiya (pp. 378-410). Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 
Golev, N.D., Kim, L.G. (2007). Amfibolicheskoe (variativno-interpretatsionnoe) funktsionirovanie teksta. Filologicheskie nauki, 4, 80-88.
Golev, N.D., Kim, L.G. (2008). Ob otnosheniyakh adresata, avtora i teksta v paradigme lingvisticheskogo interpretatsionizma. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal, 1, 144-153.
Golovin, B.N. (1980). Osnovy kul'tury rechi. Moscow. 
Grigor'eva, O.S. (2013). Vzaimodeystvie nauchnogo i uchebnogo diskursov (na materiale mental'nykh performativov). Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4 (56), V.1, 152-156. 
Gubaydullina, E.Kh. (2010). Autentichnoe tolkovanie: nuzhno li ego otnosit' k ofitsial'nomu vidu tolkovaniya norm prava v RF? Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2, 51-52. 
Istoriya yazykoznaniya (donauchnyy period): Ocherki i izvlecheniya. Tomsk: Tomskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2002. 
Kolesnik, I.V. (2010). Yazykovoy i logicheskiy sposoby tolkovaniya pravovykh norm v tekhnologii pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti arbitrazhnogo suda. Yurist" – Pravoved", 3, 8-12.
Korkunov, N.M. (1907). In Kurs lektsiy po obshchey teorii prava (pp. 342-343). SPb. 
Lebedeva, N.B. (2000). O metayazykovom soznanii yuristov i predmete yurislingvistiki (k postanovke problemy). In Yurislingvistika-2: russkiy yazyk v ego estestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii (pp.49-64). Barnaul, S. 
Makushina, E.B. (2004). Pravovaya kommunikatsiya kak fenomen prava i obshcheniya. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, V.9, 1, 141-143. 
Martyshko, N.Yu. (2012). Interpretatsionnyy podkhod k izucheniyu problemy tochnosti i odnoznachnosti yuridicheskikh terminov. In Yazyk i pravo: aktual'nye problemy vzaimodeystviya. Vyp. 2 (pp. 43-50). Rostov n/D: Donizdat. 
Neresyants, V.S. (1999). Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva. Moscow.
Nikiforova, S.A., & Krasnoperov, R.A. (2011). Filologicheskiy analiz oborota «kak takovye» v normakh rossiyskogo patentnogo prava. Patenty i litsenzii, 9, 14-30. 
Pervukhina, S.V. (2013). Semanticheskie i sintaksicheskie kharakteristiki adaptirovannogo teksta v yuridicheskom diskurse. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 4(22), Ch. II, 136-140. 
Potebnya, A.A. (1999). Mysl' i yazyk. Moscow.
Presnyakov, M.V. (2009). Problema «kachestva zakona» kak trebovanie verkhovenstva prava. Grazhdanin i pravo, 12, 43-56.
Romanenko, E.A. (2010). Voprosy sootnosheniya kom-munikatsii i pravovogo obshcheniya. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 12, 149-154.
Romanova, E.A. (2011). Pravovaya kommunikatsiya: obshcheteoreticheskiy analiz: avtoref. dis. … kand. yur. nauk. Saratov. 
Romashov, R.A. (2010). Interpretatsiya prava: lingvisticheskiy i tekhniko-yuridicheskiy aspekty. In Yurislingvistika-10: Lingvokonfliktologiya i yurisprudentsiya (pp. 52-58). Kemerovo; Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta. 
Rossiyskaya yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya (1999). Moscow: Izdatel'skiy dom INFRA-M. 
Ryabova, A.Yu. (2012). Pravovoe ponyatie «moshennichestvo na rynke tsennykh bumag»: semanticheskaya razmytost'. Yurislingvistika, 1(12), 50-54. 
Sitnikova, A.I. (2011). Zakonodatel'naya tekstologiya ugolovnogo prava: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform.
Smirnova, O.M. (2007). Filologicheskoe pravotolkovanie: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yur. nauk. Kazan'.
Sotsuro, L.V. (2000). Neofitsial'noe tolkovanie norm prava. Moscow: Profobrazovanie. 
Kherberger, M. (2003). Slovo o ponyatnosti prava v internete v epokhu internet. Yurist, 12, 56-60. 
Khramtsova, N.G. (2006). Osobennosti pravovogo diskursa kak sistemy pravovoy kommunikatsii. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1, 167-173. 
Khramtsova, N.G. (2010). Teoriya pravovogo diskursa: bazovye idei, problemy, zakonomernosti. Kurgan: Izd-vo Kurganskogo gos. un-ta.

Pages:  5-15

Back to the list



Login:
Password: