PRINCIPLES OF DERIVATIONAL MODELLING OF TEXT PRODUCTION

PRINCIPLES OF DERIVATIONAL MODELLING OF TEXT PRODUCTION

Author:  N.N. Shpilnaya

Affiliation:  Altai State Pedagogical Academy

Abstract:  Object of research. Principles of derivational modelling of text production.
The aim of the work is to justify methodological reasons for text production derivational descriptions and acceptable ways of their presenting.
Method. In the article the author uses a descriptive analytical method, shows its specific character in logical linguistic description of main principles of text production derivational description.
Methodology. The ideas developed are fitted well into the derivational grammar course as a version of formal language theory. 
Results. The author formulated and described the original theoretical principles of derivational approach for the text production presentation: the principle of dialogic nature of text production, the principle of language form priority as text production acts, the principle of epidigmatic motivation of the texts, the principle of citation as a basis of text production, the principle of suppositional connection between a lexical item and a text, the principle of multiplicity of text production models, the principle of non-opposition of intratextual and intertextual relations. 
Area of application. Proposed principles of text production description can be used as a theoretical basis for derivational modelling of different texts. The real manifestation of a derivational model is dialogical speech as a natural form of existence and functioning of the language. 
Conclusion. The proposed model of text production description broadens the ideas of presentations of text production that exist in linguistics and are traditionally conceived in the course of teleological models of the language.

Keywords:  interior text form, text derivation, immanent centric text model, principles of derivational text production modelling, text production

References: 
Azhezh, K. (2003). Chelovek govoryashchiy: Vklad lingvistiki v gumanitarnye nauki. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
Arutyunova, N.D. (1986). Dialogicheskaya tsitatsiya (k probleme chuzhoy rechi). Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1, 50-64.
Arutyunova, N.D. (1981). Faktor adresata. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka,
Vol. 40, 4, 356-367.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1997). Sobranie sochineniy. V. 5: Raboty 1940–1960 gg. Moscow: Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury.
Bennevist, E. (1974). Obshchaya lingvistika. Moscow: Progress.
Boduen de Kurtene, I.A. (1963). Izbrannye raboty po obshchemu yazykoznaniyu: v 2-kh t. Moscow: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Gal'perin, I.R. (1981). Tekst kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya. Moscow: KomKniga.
Gasparov, B.M. (1996). Yazyk, pamyat', obraz. Lingvistika yazykovogo sushchestvovaniya. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Golev, N.D. (1998). Derivatsiya i motivatsiya kak formy oyazykovlennoy determinatsii: invarianty i variant. In Ocherki po lingvisticheskoy determinologii i derivatologii russkogo yazyka (pp. 65-84). Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta.
Golev, N.D. (1989). Dinamicheskiy aspekt leksicheskoy motivatsii. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo universiteta.
Golev, N.D., Saykova (Mel'nik), N.V. (2001). Izlozhenie, parodiya, perevod … K osnovaniyam derivatsionnoy interpretatsii vtorichnykh tekstov. In Yazykovoe bytie cheloveka i etnosa: psikholingvisticheskiy i kognitivnyy aspekty. Vyp. 3 (pp. 20-27). Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta.
Golyshkina, L.A. (2012). Fenomen ritoricheskogo teksta: k probleme osmysleniya tipologicheskikh svoystv i mekhanizmov formirovaniya. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya «Filologiya i iskusstvovedenie», 3 (2), 25-28.
Gumbol'dt, fon V. (2000). Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu. Moscow: Progress.
Dymarskiy, M.Ya. (2006). Problemy tekstoobrazovaniya i khudozhestvennyy tekst (na materiale russkoy prozy KhIKh–KhKh vv.). Moscow: Editorial URSS.
Zvegintsev, V.A. 1980. O tsel'nooformlennosti edinits teksta. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka, Vol. 31, 1, 13-21.
Zubkova, L.G. (2008). Printsip znaka v kategorial'no-ierarkhicheskoy organizatsii yazyka. Prodolzhenie sleduet. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya Filologicheskoe obrazovanie, 1, 42-52.
Ionova, S.V. (2006). Approksimatsiya soderzhaniya vtorichnykh tekstov. Volgograd: Izd-vo Volgogradskogo un-ta.
Ionova, S.V. (2007). Vnutrennyaya forma teksta i sposoby ee eksplikatsii. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 6, 14-20.
Kibrik, A.E. (1992). Eskiz lingvisticheskoy modeli tekstoobrazovaniya. In Ocherki po obshchim i prikladnym voprosam yazykoznaniya (universal'noe, tipovoe i spetsifichnoe v yazyke) (pp. 287-301). Moscow,
Klyuev, E.V. Faticheskaya funktsiya yazyka i problemy referentsii. URL: http://www.kluev.com/?p=5
Kobozeva, I.M. (1986). «Teoriya rechevykh aktov» kak odin iz variantov teorii rechevoy deyatel'nosti. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike, 17. Moscow.
Kolshanskiy, G.V. (2007). Kommunikativnaya funktsiya i struktura yazyka. Moscow: URSS Editorial.
Kristeva, Yu. (2000). Bakhtin, slovo, dialog i roman. In Frantsuzskaya semiotika: Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu (pp. 427-457). Moscow: IG Progress.
Kubryakova, E.S. (2008). Nominativnyy aspekt rechevoy deyatel'nosti. Moscow: Izd-vo LKI.
Kubryakova, E.S. (2001). O tekste i kriteriyakh ego opredeleniya. In Tekst. Struktura i semantika. Vol. 1 (pp. 72-80). Moscow: SportAkademPress.
Kubryakova, E.S. (1995). Evolyutsiya lingvisticheskikh idey vo vtoroy polovine XX veka (opyt paradigmal'nogo analiza). In Yazyk i nauka kontsa XX veka. Moscow: Ros. gos. gumanit. un-t.
Lakoff, Dzh., Dzhonson, M. (2004). Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
Lotman, Yu.M. (2000). Avtokommunikatsiya: «Ya» i «Drugoy» kak adresaty (O dvukh modelyakh kommunikatsii v sisteme kul'tury). In Semiosfera (pp. 159-165). SPb.: Iskusstvo.
Lotman, Yu.M. (1970). Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta. Moscow: Iskusstvo.
Lotman, Yu.M. (1981). Tekst kak dinamicheskaya sistema. In Struktura teksta-81 (pp. 104-105). Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya i balkanistiki AN SSSR.
Mel'nikov, G.P. (1989). Printsipy i metody sistemnoy tipologii yazykov: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow.
Mel'nikov, G.P. (2000). Sistemnaya tipologiya yazykov: sintez morfologicheskoy klassifikatsii yazykov so stadial'noy: Kurs lektsiy. Moscow: Izd-vo Rossiyskogo un-ta druzhby narodov.
Mel'chuk, I.A. (1999). Opyt teorii lingvisticheskikh modeley «Smysl-Tekst»: semantika, sintaksis. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury.
Murzin, L.N. (1982). O derivatsionnykh mekhanizmakh tekstoobrazovaniya. In Teoreticheskie aspekty derivatsii (pp. 20-22). Perm': Izd-vo Perm. un-ta.
Murzin, L.N. (1983). O dinamicheskoy prirode yazyka. In Spornye voprosy russkogo yazykoznaniya: teoriya i praktika (pp. 61-68). Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU.
Murzin, L.N. (1984). Osnovy derivatologii. Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo un-ta.
Murzin, L.N. (1974). Sintaksicheskaya derivatsiya. Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo un-ta.
Murzin, L.N. (1988). Tekst – nominatsiya – leksema. In Leksicheskie aspekty v sisteme professional'no-orientirovannogo obucheniya inoyazychnoy rechevoy deyatel'nosti (pp. 16-21). Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo gos. un-ta.
Nikolaeva, T.M. (1978). Lingvistika teksta. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy. In Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 8. Moscow.
Saykova (Mel'nik), N.V. (2002). Vzaimodeystvie teksta i slova v derivatsionnom aspekte (na materiale vtorichnykh tekstov raznykh tipov): dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Barnaul.
Saykova (Mel'nik), N.V. (2011). Derivatsionnoe funktsionirovanie russkogo teksta: lingvotsentricheskiy i personotsentricheskiy aspekty: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Kemerovo.
Sakharnyy, L.V. 1991. Teksty-primitivy i zakonomernosti ikh porozhdeniya. In Chelovecheskiy faktor v yazyke: yazyk i porozhdenie rechi (pp. 221-237). Moscow: Nauka.
Sakharnyy, L.V., Shtern, A.S. (1988). Nabor klyuchevykh slov kak tip teksta. In Leksicheskie aspekty v sisteme professional'no-orientirovannogo obucheniya inoyazychnoy rechevoy deyatel'nosti (pp. 34-51). Perm': Izd-vo Permskogo gos. un-ta.
Sossyur de, F. (2010). Kurs obshchey lingvistiki. In Istoriya yazykoznaniya: XIX – 1-ya polovina XX v. (pp. 199-261). Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta.
Tezisy Prazhskogo lingvisticheskogo kruzhka (2010). In Istoriya yazykoznaniya: XIX – 1-ya polovina XX v. Ch. 2 (pp. 38-53). Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta.
Trubnikova, Yu.V. (2012). Leksiko-derivatsionnaya kontseptsiya teksta (na materiale sovremennogo russkogo yazyka): avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Barnaul.
Trubnikova, Yu.V. (2008). Leksiko-derivatsionnye osnovaniya modelirovaniya teksta. Barnaul.
Khomskiy, N. (1972). Aspekty teorii sintaksisa. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo un-ta.
Chernyavskaya, E.V. (2008). Netolerantnost' v nauke, ili kogda nauchnoe otkrytie stanovitsya nesvoevremennym. In Stereotipnost' i tvorchestvo v tekste: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov (pp. 78-88). Perm': Permskiy gosudarstvennyy un-t.
Chuvakin, A.A. (1998). Derivatsionnye otnosheniya kak tip mezhtekstovykh otnosheniy (k predmetu tekstoderivatologii). In Aktual'nye problemy derivatologii, motivologii, leksikografii (pp. 23-24). Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta.
Shmelev, D.N. (2003). Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk. Leksika. Moscow: URSS.
Shpil'naya, N.N. (2013).Vnutrennyaya forma teksta kak derivatsionnyy fenomen. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 373, 44-50.
Shpil'naya, N.N. (2012). Vnutrennyaya forma teksta kak nositel' potentsiala ego derivatsionnogo razvitiya. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4 (52), 232-235.
Shcherba, L.V. (1915). Vostochno-luzhitskoe narechie. T. 1. Pg.
Yakobson, R.O. (1975). Lingvistika i poetika. In Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv» (pp. 193-230). Moscow: Progress.
Yakobson, R.O. (1964). Razrabotka tselevoy modeli yazyka v evropeyskoy lingvistike v period mezhdu dvumya voynami. In Novoe v lingvistike. Vyp. IV. Moscow.
Yakobson, R.O. (1985). Chast' i tseloe v yazyke. In Izbrannye raboty (pp. 301-306). Moscow. URL: http://www.philology.ru/linguistics1/jakobson-85b.htm
Yakubinskiy, L.P. (1986). O dialogicheskoy rechi. In Izbrannye raboty: Yazyk i ego funktsionirovanie (pp. 17-58). Moscow: Nauka.

Pages:  73-84