SCIENTIFIC SUBJECT AREA: FROM ONTOLOGY TO CONCEPTOSPHERE

SCIENTIFIC SUBJECT AREA: FROM ONTOLOGY TO CONCEPTOSPHERE

Author:  K.I. Belousov, D.A. Baranov, N.L. Zelyanskaya

Affiliation:  Perm State National Research University, Orenburg State University

Abstract:  The article describes the conceptual hypertext program of subject area modeling based on the information about it. This information is represented in the the corpus of texts. Scientific subject area is considered as an aspect of a reality fragment that stands out, is structured and interpreted in accordance with the objectives, methods, and tools of scientific activities, carried out over a certain class of objects outlined by the scientific subject.
COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS was regarded as a subject area and  publications from the Russian scientific journal “Issues of Cognitive Linguistics”, which is entirely dedicated to the development of lingvocognitive issues, were used as a material.
Scientific subject area is considered as a mental space in which conceptualization of conceptual categorical sphere is carried out. Scientific concepts that are relevant both for the individual scientific research, and for the subject area in general, belong to different sub-systems and the structures of information space of science: terminology and nomenclature; general scientific, disciplinary, particular science (including related) subject areas. In this regard, the scientific subject area is considered as an open multistructural information system, in which the continuous intra- and intersubject process of information exchange on the available information channels is carried out. In addition, the problem of classification of nomenclature and terminological units of subject area are regarded; two approaches are proposed – universal classification and thematic classification, caused by the existing scientific problems under study.
The scientific subject area is also regarded as a conceptosphere and hypertext: the conceptosphere is structured semantic projection of the hypertext, and the hypertext is the material basis of the existence of this projection. Such understanding of the conceptosphere and hypertext relationship allows designing the concept of hypertext conceptual framework – a research program that is implemented in the program code in the form of a software tool (platform).
The transition from the ontological subject area description to the conceptual and hypertext description seems natural in case if an object of study is a science as an ongoing process of new knowledge generating.

Keywords:  scientific subject area, mental space, self-organization, term, ontology, conceptosphere, hypertext, framework, information system “Semograph”

References: 
Belousov , K.I., Baranov, D.A., Zelyanskaya, N.L. (2014). Nauchnyy kollektiv i ego predmetnye oblasti (k voprosu o metodakh effektivnogo planirovaniya nauchnoy deyatel'nosti). NTI. Seriya 1. Org. i metodika inform. Raboty, 4, 13-26.
Belousov, K.I., Zelyanskaya, N.L. (2008). Modelirovanie ponyatiynogo potentsiala termina zaglavie. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Gumanitarnye nauki, 4(8), 62-71.
Belousov, K.I., Zelyanskaya, N.L. (2012). Ontologiya i ontografiya chastnonauchnykh predmetnykh oblastey i nauchnaya kartina mira. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya, 4, 104-111.
Belousov, K.I., Zelyanskaya, N.L., Baranov, D.A. (2012). Kontseptual'no-gipertekstovaya model' upravleniya kontentom v IS «Semograf». Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 11, 59-64.
Vizel', M. (1999). Giperteksty po tu i etu storony ekrana. Inostrannaya literature, 10, 169-178.
Genis, A. (1994). Gipertekst mashina real'nosti. Inostrannaya literature, 5, 248-249.
Gladun, A.Ya., Rogushina, Yu.V. (2006). Ispol'zovanie ontologicheskikh znaniy i tezaurusov dlya ob"ektivnogo profilirovaniya spetsialistov. Iskusstvennyy intellect, 3, 379-390.
Golovina, E.V. (2010). Modelirovanie edinogo ponyatiynogo prostranstva «Filologicheskiy analiz teksta». Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 1, 249-259.
Gorshkova, E.A., Novikov, B.A., Belov, D.D., Gurov, V.S., Spiridonov, S.V. (2005). Modelirovanie kontrollera Web-prilozheniy s ispol'zovaniem UML. Programmirovanie, 1, 44-51.
Grigor'ev, V.K. (2013). Nauchnye zhurnaly mekhanizm ob"ektivnoy otsenki grantopoluchateley v tekhnologii zakrepleniya vuzovskoy molodezhi v nauke. Distantsionnoe i virtual'noe obuchenie, 4, 110-119.
Dedova, O.V. Lingvosemioticheskiy analiz elektronnogo giperteksta (na materiale russkoyazychnogo Interneta): dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow, 2006.
Kibal'nik, S.A. (2008). Roman Gazdanova «Polet» kak gipertekst. Kul'tura i tekst, 11, 42-55.
Kuznetsov, A.M. (1986). Ot komponentnogo analiza k komponentnomu sintezu. Moscow: Nauka.
Kuper, I.R. (2000). Gipertekst kak forma kommunikatsii. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 1-2, 37-59.
Kushneruk, S.L. (2007). Rasshirenie kommunikativnogo prostranstva: spetsifika tekstov elektronnykh smi v sravnenii s pechatnymi. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 3, 140-143.
Lakoff, Dzh. (2004). Zhenshchiny, ogon' i opasnye veshchi. Chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury.
Mashutina, E.A. (2009). Strukturnoe modelirovanie ponyatiynogo prostranstva termina ‘KONTsEPT’. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennnogo universiteta, 7 (188), Vyp. 41, 101-105.
Mdivani, R.R. (2013). Tezaurusy INION RAN po sotsial'nym i gumanitarnym naukam. NTI. Seriya 1. Org. i metodika inform. Raboty, 7, 23-27.
Morozova, L.A. (2004). Terminoznanie: Osnovy i metody. Moscow: GNO «Prometey» MPGU.
Moskaleva, O.V. (2013). Mozhno li otsenivat' trud uchenykh po bibliometricheskim pokazatelyam? In Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami. Spetsial'nyy vyp. 44: Naukometriya i ekspertiza v upravlenii naukoy. P. 308-331.
Nikitina, S.E. (1987). Semanticheskiy analiz yazyka nauki. Na materiale lingvistiki. Moscow: Nauka.
Osipova, I.A. (2010). Smyslovaya struktura teksta v aspekte sushchestvuyushchikh kontseptsiy klyuchevykh slov. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, V. 12, 5-3, 789-792.
Pavilenis, R.I. (1983). Problema smysla: sovremennyy logiko-filosofskiy analiz yazyka. Moscow: Mysl'.
Solovykh, Yu.S. (2009). Grafosemanticheskoe modelirovanie ponyatiynogo potentsiala termina metafora. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 11, 84-89.
Streneva, N.V. (2009). Ponyatiynyy potentsial termina «Freym». Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 11, 60-65.
Stroykov, S.A. (2010). Osnovnye ponyatiya lingvisticheskoy kontseptsii elektronnogo leksikograficheskogo giperteksta. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, V. 12, 5 (3), 808-811.
Umbrashko, D.B. (2004). Roman V.G. Sorokina «Goluboe salo» kak gipertekst: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Barnaul.
Shekhtman, N.A., Shekhtman, E.N. (2000). Problema predstavleniya znaniy i gipertekst. NTI. Seriya 1. Org. i metodika inform. Rabot, 3, 6-9.
Shchur, G.S. (2009). Teorii polya v lingvistike. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
Emer, Yu.A. (2011). Fol'klornyy diskurs: kognitivno-diskursivnoe issledovanie. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, 2, 50-60.
Yazykoznanie: bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' (1998), gl. red. V.N. Yartseva. 2-e izd. Moscow: Bol'shaya Ros. entsiklop.
BD INION – Bazy dannykh INION. URL: http://www.inion.ru/index6.php (access: 09.06.2014).
Arano, S. (2005). Thesauruses and ontologies. Hуpertext.net, 3. URL: http://eprints.rclis.org/ 8972/2/12.pdf (access: 18.04.2014).
Coburn, C.E., Turner, E.O. (2011). Research on Data Use: A Framework and Analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9, 173-206.
Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: an introduction and survey. Computer, Vol. 20, 9, 17.
Evans, B.C., Coon, D.W., Ume, E. (2011). Use of Theoretical Frameworks as a Pragmatic Guide for Mixed Methods Studies: A Methodological Necessity? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5 (4), 276-292.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landow, G.P. (1992). Hypertext. The Convergence of Contemporary Critical theory and Technology. Computer publication.
Nederhof , A.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., van Raan, A.F.J. (2010). Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: a first exploration. Scientometrics, Vol. 83, 2, 363-374.
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. Routledge.
Rau, A. (2000). What you click is what you get?: Die Stellung von Autoren und Lesern in interaktiver digitaler Literatur. Berlin: Verlagim Internet.
Schnupp, P. (1992). Hypertext. Muenchen: Oldenbourg.
Starodubov, V.I., Kurakova, N.G., Tsvetkova, L.A., Aref’ev, P.G., Kurakov, A.F. (2012). The Problems Associated with the Evaluation of World Class Competitiveness of Russia’s Science, as Illustrated by Clinical Medicine. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, Vol. 39, 3, 139-152.
Suter, B. (2000). Hyperfiktion und interaktive Narration: imfruehen Entwicklungsstadiumzueinem Genre. Zuerich: Update-Verl.
Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., Blachman, M., Dunville, R., Saul, J. (2008). Bridging the Gap Between Prevention Research and Practice: The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171-181.
Wielinga, B.J., Schreiber, A.Th., Wielemaker, J., Sandberg, J.A.C. (2001). From thesaurus to ontology. In K-CAP '01: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Knowledge capture (pp. 194-201). ACM. N.Y.
WordNet. URL: http://wordnet.princeton.edu (access: 09.06.2014).

Pages:  52-62