DIALOGIC CITATION AS DERIVATIONAL MECHANISM OF THE TEXT FORMING. DERIVED TEXT AS DIALOGIC TEXT

DIALOGIC CITATION AS DERIVATIONAL MECHANISM OF THE TEXT FORMING. DERIVED TEXT AS DIALOGIC TEXT

Author:  Shpilnaya N.N.

Affiliation:  Altai State Pedagogical University

Abstract:  The subject matter of the research is the dialogic citation as a derivational mechanism of textmaking. Derived text is seen as a dialogic text. The purpose. A logical-linguistic substantiation of the hypothesis that derivation of a dialogic text is caused by the action of the diversion mechanism such as a dialogic citation, the existence of which is motivated by social, anthropocentric, functional, semiotic and systemic-structural adaptation to the language dialogue situation. The methodology. The author analyzes derivation of the dialogue text as a result of the interaction of internal and external determinants, which appears as an effect of internal self-determination. The result. The author studies derived texts as a result of actualization of the dialogic citation. Social dependence on the text derivation is caused by the dialogue situation that is an extralinguistic condition of social and verbal interaction of speakers. Anthropocentric self-determination of text derivation is correlated with the language ability to produce dialogues of a native speaker, who is answering during communication. Functional self-determination of the derivative text is caused by the phatic function of language and phatic aspect of its internal form. Semiotic self-determination of a derivative text is caused by the interpretability of the linguistic sign and mirror symmetry of its structural organization. System-structural self-determination is caused by language structure as a dialogic system, which creates conditions using secondary Modus predicates for the expression of dialogic position of a native speaker. The applicable scope. Ontological unity of derivative and dialogical relationship allows concerning the epistemological relation to present a dialogic text / text as a derived unit of description and dialogue. Conclusion: 1. The paper justifies the existence of such derivative mechanism of textmaking as a dialogic citation. 2. It proves the ontological similarity of derivative and dialogic texts.

Keywords:  text derivation, dialogic citation, dialogic text, derived text, dialogue situation

References: 
Apresyan, Yu.D. (1986). Deyksis v leksike i grammatike i naivnaya model' mira. In Semiotika i informatika. Vyp. 28. (pp. 5-33). Moscow.
Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Fenomen vtoroy repliki, ili o pol'ze spora. In Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Protivorechivost' i anomal'nost' teksta (pp. 175-189). Moscow.
Balli, Sh. (1955). Obshchaya lingvistika i voprosy frantsuzskogo yazyka. Moscow.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1997). Sobranie sochineniy. T. 5: Raboty 1940–1960 gg. Moscow: Russkie slovari: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury.
Benvenist, E. (1974). Obshchaya lingvistika. Moscow: Progress.
Bernshteyn, N.A. (1990). Fiziologiya dvizheniy i aktivnost'. Moscow: Nauka.
Gak, V.G. (1973). Vyskazyvanie i situatsiya. In Problemy strukturnoy lingvistiki (pp. 349-372). 1972. Moscow: Nauka.
Zvegintsev, V.A. (1967). Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya lingvistika. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
Kartsevskiy, S.O. (1965). Ob asimmetrichnom dua-lizme lingvisticheskogo znaka. In Istoriya yazykoznaniya XIX–XX vekov v ocherkakh i izvlecheniyakh. Ch. 2. (pp. 85-93). Moscow. URL: http://philologos.na-rod.ru/classics/karz.htm
Kibrik, A.E. (2002). Eskiz lingvisticheskoy modeli tekstoobrazovaniya. In Ocherki po obshchim i prikladnym voprosam yazykoznaniya (universal'noe, tipovoe i spetsifichnoe v yazyke) (pp. 287-301). Moscow: Editorial URSS..
Kim, L.G. (2009). Variativno-interpretatsionnoe funktsionirovanie teksta. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo gos. ped. un-ta.
Kubryakova, E.S. (2004). Yazyk i znanie. Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya. Rol' yazyka v poznanii mira. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury.
Leont'ev. A.A. (1997). Osnovy psikholingvistiki. Moscow: Smysl.
Lotman, Yu.M. (1984). O semiosfere. In Uchenye zapiski Tartusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 641. Struktura dialoga kak printsip raboty semioticheskogo mekhanizma. Trudy po znakovym sistemam XVII (pp. 5-23). Tartu: Tartusskiy gos. un-t.
Mel'nik, N.V. (2011). Derivatsionnoe funktsioni-rovanie russkogo teksta: lingvotsentricheskiy i personotsentricheskiy aspekty: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Kemerovo.
Mel'nikov, G.P. (1976). Orfonimiya i motivirovannost' znaka. In Problemy motivirovannosti yazykovogo znaka (pp. 3-10). Kaliningrad: Kaliningradskiy gos. un-t.
Mel'nikov, G.P. (1998). Vnutrennyaya forma russkogo yazyka – klyuch k ponimaniyu ee osobennostey na vsekh urovnyakh. In Besedy v obshchestve lyubiteley rossiyskoy slovesnosti. OLRS. URL: http://phi-lologos.narod. ru/ melnikov/ melnikov-vf. html
Mel'nikov, G.P. (2000). Sistemnaya tipologiya yazykov. Printsipy, metody, modeli. Moscow: Nauka.
Migirin, V.N. (1973). Yazyk kak sistema kategoriy otobrazheniya. Kishinev: Shtintsa.
Morris, Ch.U. (2001). Osnovaniya teorii znakov. In Semiotika. Antologiya (pp. 45-97). Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga.
Murzin, L.N. (1990). Lingvisticheskoe modelirovanie i derivatsiya v rechevoy deyatel'nosti. In Derivatsiya v rechevoy deyatel'nosti: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov (pp. 4-10). Perm': Permskiy gos. un-t.
Nikitevich, V.M. (1985). Osnovy nominativnoy derivatsii. Minsk: Vysshaya shkola.
Ocherki po lingvisticheskoy determinologii i derivatologii russkogo yazyka. (1998). Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta.
Pavlov, I.P. (1950). Izbrannye trudy po fiziologii vysshey nervnoy deyatel'nosti. Moscow.
Polivanov, E.D. (1928). Faktory foneticheskoy evolyutsii yazyka kak trudovogo protsessa. In Uchenye zapiski instituta yazyka i literatury RANION. T. 3. Moscow.
Sossyur, F. (1999). Kurs obshchey lingvistiki. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta.
Feygenberg, I.M. & Zhuravlev, G.V. (1977). O veroyatnostnom prognozirovanii. In Veroyatnostnoe prognozirovanie v deyatel'nosti cheloveka (pp. 3-8). Moscow: Nauka.
Khomskiy, N. & Miller, Dzh. (2000). Vvedenie v formal'nyy analiz estestvennykh yazykov. Moscow: URSS.
Shakhnarovich, A.M. (1995). Yazykovaya lichnost' i yazykovaya sposobnost'. In Yazyk – sistema. Yazyk – tekst. Yazyk – sposobnost' (pp. 213-223). Moscow.
Shmeleva, T.V. (1995). Dialogichnost' modusa. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya, 5, 147-156.
Shpil'naya, N.N. (2014). Printsipy derivatsionnogo modelirovaniya tekstoobrazovaniya. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, 4, 73-84.
Shpil'naya, N.N. (2015). Derivatsionnye osnovaniya russkogo dialogicheskogo teksta. Barnaul: AltGPU.
Yakobson, R.O. (1975). Lingvistika i poetika. In Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv» (193-230). Moscow: Progress.
Yakubinskiy, L.P. (1986). O dialogicheskoy rechi. In Izbrannye raboty: Yazyk i ego funktsionirovanie (pp. 17-58). Moscow: Nauka.

Pages:  101-112