COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC ASPECTS OF THE VERBS WITH THE REFLEXIVE MARKERS IN RUSSIAN AND SCANDINAVIAN LANGUAGES

COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC ASPECTS OF THE VERBS WITH THE REFLEXIVE MARKERS IN RUSSIAN AND SCANDINAVIAN LANGUAGES

Author:  E.M. Chekalina

Affiliation:  Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract:  The article discusses cognitive-categorial aspects of Russian -ся verbs and Swedish models with reflexive markers – deponent verbs and voice forms with an agglutinative morpheme -s and phraseologically bound periphrastic turns with the reflexive pronoun sig in the 3 person singular / object forms of personal pronouns in the 1 and 2 person.
The aim of the article is to demonstrate that the differences in the categorial segmentation of verbal units with typologically similar reflexive markers in Russian and in Scandinavian languages, caused by systemic factors, are manifest in the cognitive content of the basic concepts. In Russian verbs with the particle -ся are lexical-grammatical which relates to word building. This is manifest in the variety of the meanings, connected to the semantics of verbal aspect and Aktionsarten. In Swedish synthetic and periphrastic models with reflexive markers differ in the interpretation of the process along the lines of conceptual categories of inactiveness/activeness.
Synthetic models with agglutinative markers in Scandinavian languages have an obvious structural-typological similarity with Russian reflexive verbs. However, the regular formation of the -s voice forms, as well as the retention of the periphrastic model with a reflexive pronoun encourage their orientation towards derivational morphology.

Keywords:  Scandinavian languages, voice, verbs with reflexive markers.

References:  Boldyrev N.N. Kategorial'noe znachenie glagola: Sistemnyj i funktsional'nyj as-pekty. Izdanie vtoroe. M.: Knizhnyj dom «LIBROKOM», 2009.
Boldyrev N.N. Funktsional'naya kategorizatsiya anglijskogo glagola. 2-e izd. M.: URSS, 2009a.
Bulygina T.V. K postroeniyu tipologii predikatov v russkom yazyke // Semanticheskie tipy predikatov. M.: Nauka, 1982. S. 7-85.
Vinogradov V.V. Russkij yazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1938.
Kubryakova E.S. CHasti rechi v onomasiologicheskom osveshhenii. M.: Nauka, 1978.
Miloslavskij I.G. Morfologicheskie kategorii sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. M.: Prosveshhenie, 1981.
Peshkovskij А.M. Russkij sintaksis v nauchnom osveshhenii. 8-e izd. M.: URSS, 2001 (1956).
Plungyan V.А. Obshhaya morfologiya. Vvede-nie v problematiku. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: URSS, 2003.
Steblin-Kamenskij M.I. Grammatika norvezhskogo yazyka. M.; L.: Izd-vo Аkademii nauk SSSR, 1957.
CHejf U. Na puti k lingvistike, osno-vannoj na myshlenii // YAzyk i mysl': Sovremennaya kognitivnaya lingvistika. M.: YAzyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2015. S. 61-88.
SHakhmatov А.А. Ocherk sovremennogo rus-skogo literaturnogo yazyka. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1941 (1865).
YAnko-Trinitskaya N.А. Vozvratnye glagoly
v sovremennom russkom yazyke. M.: Izd-vo Аkademii nauk SSSR, 1962.
Gerritsen N. Russian Reflexive Verbs. In Searching of Unity in Diversity // Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics. Vol. 15. Amsterdam – Atlanta: Rodopi, 1990.
Israeli A. Semantics and Pragmatics of the «Reflexive» Verbs in Russian. Slavistische Beiträge. Band 349. München: Verlag Otto Sagner, 1997.
Janda L.A. Cognitive Linguistics as a Continuation of the Jakobsonian Tradition. The Semantics of Russian and Czech Reflexives // American Contributions to the Eleventh International Congress of Slavists. Bratislava. Literature. Linguistics. Poetics / Robert A. Maguire and Alan Timberlake (eds). Columbus. Ohio: Slavica, 1993. P. 310-319.
Jonsson H. «Passivum med intransitiv betydelse» och genera verbi i svenskan // Kring en ordbok. Festskrift till Sven Ekbo. Stockholm: Nor-stedts, 1975. S. 73-105.
Klenin E. The Pronoun sebjá, Particle sebe, and Affix -sja // Slavic and East European Journal. 1975. 19. 2. The Ohio State University. P. 188-199.
Molde B. Svenska idag. Svar på språkfrågor. Stockholm: Rabén Prisma, 1994.
Schaarschmidt G.H. Passive and Pseudo-passive. Constructions in Russian // Scando-Slavica 17. Copenhagen, 1971. P. 141-160.
Sundman M. Om verbets s- och sig-former i modern svenska // Xenia Thorsiana. En vänskrift tillägnad Carl-Eric Thors på hans 60-årsdag den
8 juni 1980. Mirja Saari och Helena Solstrand (utg.). Meddelanden från Institutionen för nordiska språk och nordisk litteratur vid Helsingfors universitet. Serie B. № 5. 1980. S. 357-378.
Sundman M. Verbets s- och sig-form // Grammatiska kontraster. Problem i svensk grammatik i kontrastiv belysning. Seija Tiisala (utg.). Helsingfors: AFinLA, 1983. S. 137-160.
Svensk ordbok. Tredje reviderade upplagan. Utarbetad vid Språkdata, Göteborgs universitet. Stockholm: Nostedts Ordbok, 1996.
SAG – Teleman U., Hellberg S., Andersson E. Svenska Akademiens grammatik. Band 2. Ord. Band 3. Fraser. Band 4. Satser och meningar. Stockholm: Norstedts Ordbok, 1999.
Wierzbicka A. Slavyanskij dativus cum infinitivo // International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics. X. The Hague: Mouton, 1966. P. 82-102.
Zarechnak M. -sja Verbs in Russian // Slavic and East European Journal. 1971. 15.2. P. 199-209.
Språkbanken. Institutionen för svenska språket, Göteborgs universitet. Göteborg, 1975. URL: http://www.spraakbanken.gu.se/1b

For citation:  Chekalina, E. M. (2018). Cognitive-semantic aspects of the verbs with the reflexive markers in Russian and Scandinavian languages. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 3, 110-119. (In Russ.).

Pages:  110-119