THE SEMIOTICS OF GESTURES IN COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS: CONTRIBUTION AND CHALLENGES

THE SEMIOTICS OF GESTURES IN COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS: CONTRIBUTION AND CHALLENGES

Author:  O.K. Iriskhanova¹, A. Cienki²

Affiliation:  ¹ Moscow State Linguistic University, ² Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Abstract:  The present study addresses some of the fundamental issues and challenges of the semiotics of gestures in cognitive linguistics. Showing that cognitive linguists have contributed to the study of gesture forms and functions in various areas of research, the authors indicate that the questions of whether gestures are signs and whether they make a semiotic system still cause much debate.

In line with the previous studies, especially with “Kendon’s continuum”, the authors show that gestures differ in terms of conventionality, but other semiotic parameters of gestures should be taken into account as well. Relying on a broad understanding of semiosis, the authors argue that gestures should be considered as proper signs and analyzed in terms of a multi-vector model.

Unlike language signs, gestures are characterized by highly variable semiotic profiles that are shaped in multimodal usage events, and they form a fluid system with unique qualities.

Keywords:  gesture, Kendon’s continuum, usage event, semiotic profile of a gesture, semiotic system

References:  Barbieri M. Biosemiotics: a new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften. Vol. 95. Iss. 7, 2008.
P. 577-599.

Birdwhistell R.L. Kinesics and context: Essays in body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.

Bressem J. A linguistic perspective on the
notation of form features in gestures // Body – lan-


guage – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction / Müller C.,
Cienki A., Fricke E., Ladewig S.H., McNeill D., Teßendorf S. (eds.). Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton, 2013.
P. 1079-1098.

Bressem J., Ladewig S. Rethinking gesture phases: Articulatory features of gestural movement? Semiotica 184(1/4), 2011. P. 53-91.

Bressem J., Müller C. The family of away-gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment // Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction /
C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig,
D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2014. P. 1592-1604.

Cienki A. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions // Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap / Koenig J.-P. (ed.). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1998. P. 189-204.

Cienki A. Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them // Cognitive processes in language / Badio J., Kosecki K. (eds.). Bern: Peter Lang, 2012. P. 149-158.

Cienki A. Cognitive Linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization // Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction / Müller C., Cienki A., Ladewig S., McNeill D., Teßendorf S. (eds.). Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013a. P. 182-201.

Cienki A. Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11, 2013b. P. 417-432.

Cienki A. A multimodal perspective on MCA: Cues of (possible) metacommunicative awareness // Drawing attention to metaphor / Di Biase-Dyson C., Egg M. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, in press.

Cienki A., Iriskhanova O. Aspectuality across Languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2018.

Donald M. A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. N.Y.: Norton, 2001.

Eco U. The influence of Roman Jakobson on the development of semiotics // Classics of semiotics / Krampen M. et al. (eds.). N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1987.
P. 109-127.

Gibbs R.W. Jr., Colston H.L. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6, 1995.
P. 347-378.



Gullberg M. Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: a study of learners
of French and Swedish. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press, 1998.

Kendon A. Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance // The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication / Ritchie
Key M. (ed.). The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1980.
P. 207-227.

Kendon A. How gestures can become like words // Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication / Poyatos F. (ed.). Lewiston, N.Y.:
C.J. Hogrefe, 1998. P. 131-141.

Kendon A. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Kibrik A.A., Molchanova N.B. Channels of multimodal communication: Relative contributions to discourse understanding // Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2013. P. 2704-2709.

Kita S. 2000. How representational gestures help speaking // Language and gesture / McNeill D. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 162-185.

Ladewig S.H. Recurrent gestures // Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction / Müller C.,
Cienki A., Fricke E., Ladewig S. H., McNeill D., Bressem J. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2014. P. 1558-1574.

Langacker R.W. A usage-based model // Topics in cognitive linguistics / Rudzka-Ostyn B. (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988. P. 127-161.

McNeill D. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1992.

McNeill D. Gesture and thought. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2005.

Mittelberg I. Peircean Semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar // Metaphor and gesture / Cienki A., Müller C. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. P. 115-154.

Mittelberg I. Iconic and representational gestures // Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction / Müller C., Cienki A., Fricke E., Ladewig S.H.,
McNeill D., Bressem J. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2014. P. 1732-1746.

Müller C. Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag, 1998.



Müller C. Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? // The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures /
Müller C., Posner R. (eds.). Berlin: Weidler, 2004.
P. 233-256.

Müller C. From mimesis to meaning: A systematics of gestural mimesis for concrete and abstract referential gestures // Meaning, mind and communication. Explorations in cognitive semiotics / Zlatev J., Sonesson G., Konderak P. (eds.). Berlin: Peter Lang, 2016. P. 211-227.

Müller C., Tag S. The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics 10 (6), 2010. P. 85-120.

Sebeok T.A., Umiker-Sebeok J. (eds.). Biosemiotics. The semiotic web 1991. Berlin; N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.

Sinha C. Grounding, mapping, and the acts of meaning // Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology / Janssen T., Redeker G. (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. P. 223-256.

Sonesson G. Some issues in the semiotics of gesture: The perspective of comparative semiotics // Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction / Müller C., Cienki A., Fricke E., Ladewig S., McNeill D., Teßendorf S. (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2014. P. 1989-1999.

Stokoe W. Sign Language Structure. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok, 1987.

Uexküll J. von. Theoretische Biologie. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1928.

Zlatev J. What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language // From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics/ Hampe B. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. P. 313-343.

Zlatev J. The coevolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis // The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity / Zlatev J., Racine T., Sinha C., Itkonen E. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2008. P. 215-244.

Grishina E.A. Russkaya zhestikulyaciya s lingvisticheskoj tochki zreniya: korpusnye issledovaniya. M.: YAzyki slav. kul'tur, 2017.

Iriskhanova O.K., Prokof'eva O.N. Fokusirovanie v ustnom opisatel'nom diskurse: analiz vizual'noj percepcii, rechi i zhestov // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2017. Vyp. XXIX. S. 80-87.

Krejdlin G.E. Neverbal'naya semiotika. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2002.



Fedorova O.V., Kibrik A.A. Obshchee, individual'noe i kontekst v mul'tikanal'noj kommunikacii // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2018. Vyp. XXXIII. S. 637-645.  

Acknowledgments:  The research was carried out at Moscow State Linguistic University and supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 14-48-00067П).

For citation:  Iriskhanova, O. K., & Cienki, A. (2018). The Semiotics of Gestures in Cognitive Linguistics: Contribution and Challenges. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 4, 25-36.

Pages:  25-36