Tambov
All-Russian academic journal
“Issues of Cognitive Linguistics”

IMAGES OF SLAVIC PEOPLE IN MEDIA COVERAGE OF BREXIT

IMAGES OF SLAVIC PEOPLE IN MEDIA COVERAGE OF BREXIT


Author:  S.L. Kushneruk

Affiliation:  Chelyabinsk State University

Abstract:  The author takes up a cognitive-discursive approach to the analysis of images of the Slavs against the backdrop of Brexit procedure.
The objective of the paper is to examine mechanisms of media portrayal of the Western, Eastern and Southern Slavic national groups in the British media in the context of a political process. The term ‘discourse-world of Brexit’ is introduced to denote a conceptually complex discourse-level structure, serving as a background, against which national images of the Slavs are silhouetted.
The author argues that media images of the Slavs are organized by frames, which enable media managers to negatively or neutrally evaluate members and non-members of the European Union, and systematizes media frames structuring the national images. Examples from the News on the Web corpus are used to prove that images of the Slavs are discursively constrained and biased.
The analysis of the examples shows that in the context of Brexit, the images of the Eastern Slavs are mostly negativized which, presumably, may be explained by the increased role of Russia in the contemporary world.
The results of the research might present interest to discourse analysts for further investigation of prejudices to national ingroups and outgroups in the media.

Keywords:  media representation, discourse-world, media discourse, mass communication, British media, Slavs, Brexit.

References:  Болдырев Н.Н. Когнитивный подход в линг-вистике и смежных областях знания // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2020. № 2. С. 5-25. [Boldyrev N.N. Kognitivnyy podkhod v lingvistike i smezhnykh oblastyakh znaniya // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2020. № 2. S. 5-25.] DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2020-2-5-25
Борискина О.О., Шилихина К.М. Корпусные исследования политического дискурса в лингвистике // Политическая наука. 2017. № 2. С. 30-53. [Boriskina O.O., Shilikhina K.M. Korpusnye issledovaniya politicheskogo diskursa v lingvistike // Politicheskaya nauka. 2017. № 2. S. 30-53.]
Дейк Т.А. ван. Дискурс и власть: Репрезентация доминирования в языке и коммуникации. М., 2014. [Deyk T.A. van. Diskurs i vlast': Reprezentatsiya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikatsii. M., 2014.]
Интерпретация мира в языке: коллективная монография. Тамбов, 2017. [Interpretatsiya mira v yazyke: kollektivnaya monografiya. Tambov, 2017.]
Abrams D., Houston D. M. Equality, diversity and prejudice in Britain: results from the 2005 national survey: report for the cabinet office equalities review. DTI London. 2006.
Beller M., Leerssen J. (eds). Imagology. The Cultural Construction and Literary Representation of National Characters. A Critical Survey. Amsterdam; N.Y., 2007.
Chandio M. M., Sah M. Brexit sentiment analysis: changing opinions about Brexit and UK // Intelligent Computing Paradigm and Cutting-edge Technologies. 2020. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ public-cation/338350281_Brexit_Twitter_Sentiment_Ana-lysis_ Changing_Opinions_About_Brexit_and_UK_Politicians
Curtis M. Introduction to the transaction edition // Lipman W. Public opinion: with a new introduction by Michael Curtis. Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK). 1998. P. xi-xxxvi.
Dováľová G., Majzlíková Stracová E., Hošoff B. Brexit – the Visegrad Countries perspective // Ekonomický časopis. 2019. No. 67 (č. 10). P. 1013-1034.
Đurović T., Silaški N. The End of a Long and Fraught Marriage: Metaphorical Images Structuring the Brexit Discourse // Metaphor and the Social World. 2018. 8 (1). P. 25-39.
Entman R.M. Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm // Journal of Communication. 1993. No. 43. 51-58.
Fairclough N. Language and Power. London: Longman. 1989.
Fontaine L. The early semantics of the neologism BREXIT: a lexicogrammatical approach // Functional Linguistics. 2017. No. 4:6. P. 1-15.
Gamson W.A., Modigliani A. The changing culture of affirmative action // Braungart R.G., Braungart M.M. (eds). Research in political socio-logy. Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1987.
P. 137-177.
Gavins J., Lahey E. (eds). World Building: Discourse in the Mind. Bloomsbury. 2016.
Gheorghiu O.C. Brexit framing in British media, MCDSARE. 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/336265546_BREXIT_FRAMING_IN_BRITISH_MEDIA
Hartley J. Communication, cultural and media studies. The key concepts. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group: London; N.Y. 2002.
Hurcombe E. The Making of a Captain: the Production and projection of a political image on the Tony Abbott Facebook page // Communication, Politics and Culture. 2016. No. 49 (1). P. 19-38.
Hutchings P.B., Sullivan K.E. Prejudice and the Brexit vote: a tangled web // Palgrave Communications. 2019. URL: https://rdcu.be/b3rNY
Kunczik M. Globalization: News media, images of nations and the flow of international capital with special reference to the role of rating agencies. Conference, 2000, July 17 – July 20. Singapore: IAMCR. 2001.
Kunczik M. Images of nations and international public relations. New Jersey. 2016.
Meislova M.B. Brexit Means Brexit – or Does It? The Legacy of Theresa May's Discursive Treatment of Brexit // The Political Quarterly 2019. No. 90 (4). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336417317_Brexit_Means_Brexit-or_Does_It_The_Legacy_of_There-sa_ May's_Discursive_Treatment_of_Brexit
Mompean J.A., Valenzuela J. Brexit means Brexit: a constructionist analysis // Complutense Journal of English Studies. 2019. No. 27. P. 1-37.
Musolff A. Truths, lies and figurative scenarios – Metaphors at the heart of Brexit // Journal of Language and Politics. 2017. No. 16 (5). P. 641-657.
Qaiwer S.N. A Study of Identity Construction in Political Discourse: Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 2016. URL: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/309607807_A_study_of_identity_construction_in_political_discourse
Sheufele D.A. Framing as a theory of media effects // Journal of Communication. 1999. No. 49 (1). P. 103-122.
Tewksbery D., Sheufele D.A. News Framing Theory and Research. 2009. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.4324%2F9780429491146-4?_sg% 5B0%5D=stOxMXlIitoyy4O3iXEVajVri6DeCdsPIzMl6nsMkh7JhZ0U661Zn_l084KXMVcDW1Dp84fviLLpGwZxXicf4rIxow.kJoZfJIFYhuzXggrl0ehvpFHE6GnBTBPJcTz-7UIXb5xM6YIVYkmok3hWuYTYk g-Ny9nksi4DRiwhCYFJqSR_g
Tien N.H., Bien B.X., Vu N.T., Hung N.T. Brexit and risks for the world economy // International Journal of Research in Finance and Management 2019. No. 2 (2). P. 99-104.
Tincheva N. Discourse-world profiling expressions: contrasting data from British and Bulgarian political speeches // Language Close Up. Sofia: Sofia University Press. 2018. URL: https://www.re-searchgate.net/publication/331198543_DISCOURSE_WORLD-PROFILING_EXPRESSIONS_CONTRAS-TING_DATA_FROM_BRITISH_AND_BULGARIAN_POLITICAL_SPEECHES
Tincheva N. ‘Brexit means…’ UK vs. continental online-media users and English-language metaphoric conceptualizations // Journal of Language and Politics. 2019. No. 18: 6. P. 848-869.
Van Dijk T. Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. 2000. URL: http://www.discourses.org/OldBooks/Teun%20A%20van%20Dijk%20-%20Ideology%20and%20Discour-se.pdf
Van Dijk T. Discourse, context and cognition // Discourse Studies. 2006. No. 8 (1). P. 159-177.
Van Dijk T. Ideology and Discourse // Freeden M., Tower Sargent L., Stears M. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 175-196.
Van Dijk T. Sociocognitive Discourse Studies // Richardson J., Flowerdew J. (eds). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Routledge. 2016. URL: http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Sociocognitive%20Discourse%20Studies.pdf
Van Gorp B. Where is the frame? Victims and Intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue // European Journal of Communication. 2005. No. 20 (4). P. 484-507.
Wodak R. Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA // Discourse Studies. 2006. No. 8 (1). P. 179-190.
Wodak R., Meyer M. (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London. Thousand Oaks. New Delhi. SAGE Publications. 2001.

Acknowledgments:  The research was funded by RFBR and Chelyabinsk Region, project number 20-412-740004.

For citation:  Kushneruk, S. L. (2021). Images of Slavic people in media coverage of Brexit. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 2, 99-110. (In Russ.).

Pages:  99-110

Back to the list



Login:
Password: