Tambov
All-Russian academic journal
“Issues of Cognitive Linguistics”

STATE AS A LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE FORMAT

STATE AS A LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE FORMAT


Author:  A.V. Pavlova

Affiliation:  Derzhavin Tambov State University

Abstract:  The goal of the paper is to consider STATE as a linguistic knowledge format. The concept of STATE is a complex propositional structure that includes “the bearer of the state + state characteristics”. The main conceptual characteristics of STATE are “stability”, “duration”, “the passive bearer of the state”, “generalized activity”, “localization in space”. States have no referents in real world, they gain their meaning being related with their bearer, so they contain inferential knowledge providing secondary representation of knowledge about the world. The revealed modus character of STATE brings in focus the interpretative stative function of linguistic cognition which is the basis of forming the category of state. Antecedence of realization of stative function, predicativity and conceptual relatedness with the cognitive domain of the bearer of the state are the principal criteria for defining the centre and periphery of the category of state. Words of the category of state functioning only as predicatives occupy the central position in the category of state. They represent the following semantic domains: physical state (akin, alive, asleep, awake, etc.), emotional state (ablush, aflutter, afraid, aghast, agog, ashamed, etc.), location in space, the state of motion, state as a generalized activity (aground, ajar, askew, adrift, afloat, astray, astir, etc.). The close periphery has its pivotal part structured by the adjectives and verbs possessing the stative meaning. The far periphery of the category of state is represented with word formative suffixes –ment, -dom, -hood. Their place is defined by their dependence on the root morpheme and the secondary character of expressing the stative meaning.

Keywords:  modus concept STATE, the category of state, state linguistic knowledge format, interpretative stative function of linguistic cognition.

References:  Boldyrev N.N. (2007) O tipologii znanij i ikh reprezentacii v jazyke // Tipy znanij i ikh reprezentacija v jazyke: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Tambov: Izd-vo TGU im. G.R. Derzhavina. S. 12-28.
Boldyrev N.N. (2008) Mnogoaspektnost' kak osobyj format znanija i lingvisticheskie metody ego issledovanija // Mezhdunarodnyj kongress po kognitivnoj lingvistike: sbornik materialov / otv. red. N.N. Boldyrev. M.: In-t jazykoznanija RAN; Tambov: Izd. dom TGU im. G.R. Derzhavina. S. 50-55.
Boldyrev N.N. (2008) Ocenochnye kategorii kak format znanija // Kognitivnye issledovanija jazyka. Vyp. III. S. 25-36.
Boldyrev N.N. (2009) Konceptual'naja osnova jazyka // Kognitivnye issledovanija jazyka. Vyp. IV. S. 25-77.
Boldyrev N.N. (2009) Formaty znanija v jazyke i metody ikh issledovanija // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Kafedra anglijskoj filologii. 1994–2009. Prilozhenie k zhurnalu. Tambov. S. 57-77.
Boldyrev N.N. (2010) Problemy konceptual'nogo analiza // Mezhdunarodnyj kongress po kognitivnoj lingvistike: sbornik materialov / otv. red. N.N. Boldyrev. M.: In-t jazykoznanija RAN; Tambov: Izd. dom TGU im. G.R. Derzhavina. S. 34-37.
Boldyrev N.N. (2011) Interpretirujushhaja funkcija jazyka // Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. № 31. Serija: Filologija. Iskusstvovedenie. Vyp. 60. S. 11-16.
Burgin M.S., Kuznecov V.I. (1994) Vvedenie v sovremennuju tochnuju metodologiju nauki: Struktury sistem znanija: posobie dlja studentov VUZov. M.: AO «Aspekt Press».
Golovanova E.I. (2014) Obraz, ponjatie, geshtal't kak formaty professional'nogo znanija // Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. № 6. Serija: Filologija. Iskusstvovedenie. Vyp. 88. S. 122-125.
Vinogradova S.G. (2014) Slozhnoe predlozhenie kak format jazykovogo znanija: interpretacionnyj aspekt // Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki. № 3. S. 10-18.
Dubrovskaja O.G. (2012) Diskursivnyj stil' kak format znanija // Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki. № 1. S. 29-39.
Iriskhanova O.K. (2010) O jazykovoj gibridizacii, leksicheskikh gibridakh i fokuse vnimanija // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. № 603. S. 27-44.
Kubrjakova E.S. (2008) O sootnoshenii jazyka i dejstvitel'nosti i svjazi ehtoj problemy s traktovkoj ponjatija znanija // Kognitivnye issledovanija jazyka. Vyp. III. S. 11-24.
Kubrjakova E.S. (2009) V poiskakh sushhnosti jazyka: vmesto vvedenija // Kognitivnye issledovanija jazyka. Vyp. IV. S. 11-24.
Magirovskaja O.V. (2009) Reprezentacija sub"ekta poznanija v jazyke: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Tambov.
Manerko L.A. (2013) Struktury znanij, predstavlennye v khudozhestvennom i akademicheskom diskursakh // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 22. Teorija perevoda. M.: Izd-vo MGU. № 1. S. 56-70.
Panasenko L.A. (2012) Leksicheskie kategorii kak interpretirujushhie formaty znanija // Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki. № 4. S. 58-65.
Suslov A.A. (2012) Rimskoe pravo: kurs lekcij. Tomsk: Ehl' Kontent.
Chernejko L.O. (1997) Lingvo-filosofskij analiz abstraktnogo imeni: monografija. M.: Ris MGU.
Evans V. (2010) From the spatial to the non-spatial: The “state” lexical concepts of in, on and at. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (eds.) Language, Cognition & Space. London: Equinox. P. 350-387.
Schmid H.J. (2000) English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin; N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vendler Z. (1967) Facts and Events // Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y. P. 12-146.
Winkler A.C., McCuen-Metherell J.R. (2008) Writing the research paper. Boston: Wadsworth.

Pages:  96-102

Back to the list



Login:
Password: