RECURRENT ENGLISH STRUCTURES VIEWED AS GRAMMAR CONSTRUCTIONS

RECURRENT ENGLISH STRUCTURES VIEWED AS GRAMMAR CONSTRUCTIONS

Author:  I.Yu. Kolesov

Affiliation:  Altai State Pedagogical University

Abstract: 

The article is focused on English grammatical constructions considered within the framework of cognitive-discourse analysis and viewed along the perspectives of Construction Grammar theory. The analysis is directed upon recurrent structures in English, i.e. structures that are regularly produced and therefore functionally significant for the English language, considered as idiomatic unity of form and meaning, and, as a rule, having propositional content. The study of the constructional features of language units is supplemented by mental schematization of their content based on the idea that the structures under analysis represent the language techniques employed in interpreting referent scenes.

The grammar of constructions as a research issue dealing with organizing language units that belong to various linguistic subsystems (phonological structure, lexicon, grammar), has become the subject of quite a number of ​​cognitively and structurally oriented research (called, for example, constructional grammar, linguistics of constructions, Construction Grammar). The study of recurrent linguistic units from the point of view of their structural and cognitive features allows us to consider the types of organization of linguistic units that are regularly reproduced in a language in a semiotic aspect: the content plan of constructions is propositions (or their contractions) as concepts of referent situations comprehended by the speaker.

From the point of view of the specificity of a particular language, it is significant to involve in the study of the material of the English language, in which the constructional mechanisms are more obvious than, for example, in the Russian language, due to the fact that tendencies towards analyticism and features of the isolating system have become typologically significant in English. For this reason, the study of the structural features of linguistic units in the English language, it seems, can bring some clarity to the specifics of its structural organization.

Since modern linguistic theory has a poly-paradigmatic character, several of its most important interpretations are closely intertwined in the study of the essence of language. They include the perspective of its interpretation as a cognitive mechanism, as a verbal semiotic system and as an ethnocultural socio-discursive phenomenon. In modern studies, the structural features of linguistic units are supplemented by the aspect of mental schematization of their content. Mental schemes fix the mental images of cognizable situations formed in consciousness – mental representations, which can then be described in terms of different types of schemes in the Bartlett sense (situations, scenes, scenarios, frames, etc.).

The research material is examples of English structures extracted during a targeted sample from the British National English Corpus, as well as from Internet sites. The main methods of analysis are semantic, conceptual and collocation.

The aim of the study is to find procedures for analyzing the structures of the English language that meet the criteria for grammatical structures, as well as to identify a general approach to the analysis of syntactic and word-formation types of structures. As the main results of the study, conclusions are proposed about the essence of categorizing and semiotic functions of recurrent structures, which seem to most fully demonstrate the conceptual essence of the analyzed structures.

Keywords:  grammar of constructions, recurrent structures, conceptualization, reference scene, conceptual scheme.

References:  Болдырев Н.Н. Когнитивная семантика. Тамбов: Изд-во Тамб. ун-та, 2000. [Boldyrev N.N. Kognitivnaya semantika. Tambov: Izd-vo Tamb. un-ta, 2000]

Болдырев Н.Н. Язык и система знаний. Когнитивная теория языка. М.: Издательский дом ЯСК, 2019. [Boldyrev N.N. Yazyk i sistema znaniy. Kognitivnaya teoriya yazyka. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom YaSK, 2019.]

Иванова С.В., Чанышева З.З. Слово в контексте культурно-исторического универсума: на примере политического дискурса США // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Лингвистика. 2018. Т. 22. №4. Культурная семантика и прагматика: к юбилею Анны Вежбицкой. С. 874-894. [Ivanova S.V., Chanysheva Z.Z. Slovo v kontekste kul'turno-istoricheskogo universuma: na primere politicheskogo diskursa SShA // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Lingvistika. 2018. T. 22. № 4. Kul'turnaya semantika i pragmatika: k yubileyu Anny Vezhbitskoy. S. 874-894]

Кобрина Н.А. Функциональная модель языка // Взаимодействие языковых единиц различных уровней / Ленингр. гос. пед. ин-т им. А. И. Герцена; отв. ред. Л. В. Шишкова. Л.: ЛГПИ, 1981. С. 30-45. [Kobrina N.A. Funktsional'naya model' yazyka // Vzaimodeystvie yazykovykh edinits razlichnykh urovney / Leningr. gos. ped. in-t im. A. I. Gertsena; otv. red. L. V. Shishkova. L.: LGPI, 1981. S. 30-45]

Козлова Л.А. Этнокультурный потенциал залоговых форм и его дискурсная актуализация // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Лингвистика. 2018. Т. 22. № 4. Культурная семантика и прагматика: к юбилею Анны Вежбицкой. С. 874-894. [Kozlova L.A. Etnokul'turnyy potentsial zalogovykh form i ego diskursnaya aktualizatsiya // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Lingvistika. 2018. T. 22. № 4. Kul'turnaya semantika i pragmatika: k yubileyu Anny Vezhbitskoy. S. 874-894]

Колесов И.Ю. О Некоторых проявлениях конструкционности в английском языке // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2016. № 25. С. 491-498. [Kolesov I.Yu. O Nekotorykh proyavleniyakh konstruktsionnosti v angliyskom yazyke // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2016. №  25. S. 491-498]

Кубрякова Е.С. Обеспечение речевой деятельности и проблемы внутреннего лексикона // Человеческий фактор в языке: язык и порождение речи. М.: Наука, 1991. [Kubryakova E.S. Obespechenie rechevoy deyatel'nosti i problemy vnutrennego leksikona // Chelovecheskiy faktor v yazyke: yazyk i porozhdenie rechi. M.: Nauka, 1991]

Кубрякова Е.С. Парадигмы научного знания в лингвистике и ее современный статус // Известия РАН, Серия Литературы и языка. 1994. Т. 53 (2). С. 3-15. [Kubryakova E.S. Paradigmy nauchnogo znaniya v lingvistike i ee sovremennyy status // Izvestiya RAN, Seriya Literatury i yazyka. 1994. T. 53 (2). S. 3-15]

Кубрякова Е.С. Язык и знание. М.: РАН. Ин-т языкознания; Языки славянской культуры, 2004. [Kubryakova E.S. Yazyk i znanie. M.: RAN. In-t yazykoznaniya; Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004]

Лингвистика конструкций / Российская акад. наук, Ин-т русского яз. им. В В. Виноградова; отв. ред. Е.В. Рахилина. М.: Азбуковник, 2010. [Lingvistika konstruktsiy / Rossiyskaya akad. nauk, In-t russkogo yaz. im. V.V. Vinogradova; otv. red. E.V. Rakhilina. M.: Azbukovnik, 2010.]

Падучева Е.В. Динамические модели в семантике лексики. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004. [Paducheva E.V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004.]

Падучева Е.В. Нужен ли лингвистике эпитет “когнитивный”? // НТИ. Сер. 2. Информ. процессы и системы. 2003. № 11. С. 38-43. [Paducheva E.V. Nuzhen li lingvistike epitet “kognitivnyy”? // NTI. Ser. 2. Inform. protsessy i sistemy. 2003. № 11. S. 38-43]

Рахилина Е.В. Категориальная структура и грамматика конструкций: контейнер. URL: Http://www.ksu.ru/ss/cogsci04/science/cogsci04/212.doc [Rakhilina E.V. Kategorial'naya struktura i grammatika konstruktsiy: konteyner. URL: Http://www.ksu.ru/ss/cogsci04/science/cogsci04/212.doc]

Рахилина Е.В., Тестелец Я.Г. Научное наследие Ч. Филлмора и современная теория языка // Вопросы языкознания, 2016. № 2. С. 7-21. [Rakhilina E.V., Testelets Ya.G. Nauchnoe nasledie Ch. Fillmora i sovremennaya teoriya yazyka // Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2016. № 2. S. 7-21]

Arnold D., Spencer A. A constructional analysis for the skeptical // Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2015. P. 41-60. URL: http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/HPSG/2015/arnold-spencer.pdf

Boas H.C. Ziem A. (eds.) Constructional Approaches to Syntactic Structures in German. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2018.

Boas H.C., Fried M. Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2005.

Croft W. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Croft W., Cruse D.A. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864

Diessel H. Usage-based construction grammar // Dąbrowska E., Divjak D. (eds.). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015. P. 296-322.

Eynde F. van. Sign-Based Construction Grammar: A Guided Tour // Journal of Linguistics. 2016. №52 (1). P. 194-217. URL: http://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226715000341

Fillmore Ch., Kay P., O’Connor M.C. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions // Language. 1988. №64 (3). Р. 501-538.

Fried M. Principles of constructional change // Hoffmann Th., Trousdale G. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (Oxford Handbooks). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 419-437.

Fried M. Construction Grammar // Kiss T., Alexiadou A. (eds.). Syntax – Theory and Analysis : An International Handbook, vol. 42 (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2015. P. 974-1003.

Gladkova A., Larina T. Anna Wierzbicka, Words and the World // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018a. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 499-520.

Gladkova A., Larina T. Anna Wierzbicka, language, culture and communication // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018b. Vol. 22. No. 4. P.717-748.

Goldberg A.E. Fitting a slim dime between the verb template and argument structure construction approaches // Theoretical Linguistics. 2014. №40 (1-2). P. 113-135.

Hanink E. Postsyntactic inflection of the degree phrase in German // Proceeding of the Linguistic Society of America. 2018. №3, 23-1-15. URL: https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4308

Hilpert M. Construction Grammar and Its Application to English. Edinburgh University Press Series. Edinburgh textbooks on the English language: Advanced. Edinburgh University Press, 2014.

Hoffmann Th., Trousdale G. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013.

Kay P., Michaelis L.A. Constructional meaning and compositionality // Maienborn C., Heusinger K., Portner P. (eds.). Semantics – Interfaces. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2019. P. 293–324. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110589849-009

Langacker R.W. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Östman J.-O. Construction discourse: a prolegomenon // Östman J.-O., Fried M. (eds.). Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005. P. 121-144.

Sag I.A., Boas H.C., Kay P. Introducing Sign-Based Construction Grammar // Boas H.C., Sag I.A. (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (CSLI Lecture Notes 193), Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2012. P. 1-29.

Seligman J., Moss L. Situation Theory // Benthem J. van, Meulen A. ter (eds.). Handbook of Logic and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and Amsterdam: North Holland, 1997. P. 239-309.

Singh R. Derivational Grammar Model and Basket Verb: A Novel Approach to the Inflectional Phrase in the Generative Grammar and Cognitive Processing // English Linguistics Research. 2018. № 7 (2). URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v7n2p9

Talmy L. How Language Structures Space // Pick H.L., Acredolo L.P. (eds.). Spatial Orientation, Boston, MA: Springer, 1983. P. 225-282.

Trijp R., van. Cognitive vs. generative Construction Grammar: the case of coercion and argument structure // Cognitive Linguistics. 2014. №26 (4). P. 613-632.

Vieira M.M., Wiedemer M.L. Variationist Sociolinguistics and Construction Grammar: the Challenges and the Prospects of Compatibilization // Vieira M.M., Wiedemer M.L. (orgs.). Dimensões e experiências em Sociolinguística. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019. P. 21-28.

Weber C. ‘Flying Planes Can Be Dangerous’ // Millennium. 2002. Vol. 31. No.1. P. 129-147.

Zeller J. Derivations or constraints? Core aspects of syntax and morphology in competing grammatical frameworks // Mesthrie R. Bradley D. (eds.). The Dynamics of Language. Cape Town: UCT Press, 2018. P. 204-230.


BNC – British National Corpus [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/

DVLA – Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dvla-hits-the-road-with-clear-warning-to-tax-it-or-lose-it

For citation:  Kolesov, I. Yu. (2023). Recurrent English structures viewed as grammar constructions. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 1, 99-112 (In Russ.).

Pages:  99-112