Tambov
All-Russian academic journal
“Issues of Cognitive Linguistics”

BOOSTING IN DISSENTING OPINIONS: TYPES AND LEXICAL REALIZATIONS

BOOSTING IN DISSENTING OPINIONS: TYPES AND LEXICAL REALIZATIONS


Author:  О.А. Boginskaya

Affiliation:  Irkutsk National Research Technical University

Abstract:  The paper explores the role of boosting as a metadiscourse feature used by justices in dissenting opinions to challenge the majority decisions and convince an audience.
The aim is to identify the types of boosting and lexical items used for indicating certainty and commitment. As the study aims to analyze how boosting is realized linguistically, the methods of quantitative and interpretative analysis were applied.
The study revealed that the justices make extensive use of boosters to show disagreement and persuade the audience to agree with their views. For this purpose, they use four types of boosting, including certainty boosters, intensity boosters, solidarity boosters, and extremity boosters with a quantitative predominance of the first type.

Keywords:  dissenting opinion, boosting, metadiscourse, legal discourse.

References:  Chaemsaithong K. Evaluative stancetaking in courtroom opening statements // Folia Linguistica. 2017. Vol. 51(1). P. 103-132.
Crismore A., Farnsworth R. Meta-discourse in popular and professional science discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
Ferguson R.A. The Judicial Opinion as a Literary Genre // Yale Journal of Law and Humanities. 1990. Vol. 2. P. 201-219.
Hyland K. Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter // Journal of Business Communication. 1998. Vol. 35(2). P. 224-245.
Hyland K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum, 2005.
Hyland K., Zou K. “I believe the findings are fascinating”: Stance in three-minute theses // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2021. Vol. 50. P. 100973.
Langford C. Toward a Genre of Judicial Dissent: Lochner and Casey as Exemplars // Communication Law Review. 2009. Vol. 9(2). P. 1-12.
Matoesian G. The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity // Language in Society. 1999. Vol. 28. P. 491-521.
Vassileva I. Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing // English for specific purposes. 2001. Vol. 20. P. 83-102.

For citation:  Boginskaya, O. A. (2023). Boosting In Dissenting Opinions: Types and Lexical Realizations. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 3, 106-111.

Pages:  106-111

Back to the list



Login:
Password: