All-Russian academic journal
“Issues of Cognitive Linguistics”
Author: S.N. Bredikhin
Affiliation: Северо-Кавказский федеральный университет
Abstract:
This paper is devoted to hierarchical noematic structure of sense and transformation models of sense derivation within the superstructure changes. The aim of the study is to combine the deep structures and noematiс. The new sense derivation turns into a process of overflow and mutations that pervades the entire cognitive sphere.
The certain super construction for grounding potentials at the nodal points of its structure undergoes the following transformations: 1) the attachment of actualized sense-quanta to certain super-structure elements, 2) metalizing facets of sense attached to objects of thought-activity and comprehended by the recipient, 3) remetalizing semantic structures in accordance with the value-conceptual system of the producer/recipient, 4) sense quantum actualization of the cogitativity acts, 5) definition of the nodal quanta’s value, 6) diffraction of the existing nodes of the sense super structure, 7) object of thought-activity mutation with continuously updated elements of the structure, 8) the related actualized quanta modification of the given situation as a result of phenomenological reflection at failures in the communicative act, 9) actualization or deactualization positions counter positions with in the structure of dominant-noem, cultural base noem and peripheral noem, 10) sense amphiboly, 11) increasing the conceptual and accentual structure capacity by actualizing additional, related peripherals noems,
12) value juxtaposed noems interference, 13) the value quanta of the general sense structure leveling for the producer/recipient, 14) the sense catharsis.
Sense is a dynamic phenomenon, occurring in every text generation and reception, it is a phenomenon by which we rebuild the perceived objective reality.
Keywords: noem, sensederivation, sensemutation, noematic reflection, phenomenological reflection, superconstruction
References:
Bogin, G.I. Substantsial'naya storona ponimaniya teksta. Tver': TGU, 1993.
Bredikhin, S.N. Prolegomeny k obshchey teorii smysla filosofskogo diskursa (vvedenie
v ierarkhicheskuyu noematiku smyslovykh struktur) . Stavropol': Stavropol'skoe Izdatel'stvo «Paragraf», 2012.
Guseynov, A.A. O chem my govorim, kogda govorim o dialoge tsivilizatsiy. In Dialog kul'tur i tsivilizatsiy v global'nom mire: VII Mezhdunarodnye Likhachevskie nauchnye chteniya. 24-25 maya 2007 g. SPb.: SPbGUP, 2007. P. 57-62.
Kuz'mina, N.A. Fenomen khudozhestvennogo perevoda v svete teorii interteksta. URL: http:// www. irlras-cfrl.rema.ru:8101/publications/reports/pere-vod-2.htm.
Likhachev, D.S. Russkaya kul'tura Novogo vremeni i Drevnyaya Rus' In D.S. Likhachev (Ed.), Izbrannye trudy po russkoy i mirovoy kul'ture. SPb.: SPbGUP, 2006.
Mamardashvili, M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu. Moscow: Progress, 1990.
Milostivaya, A.I. K voprosu o roli kognitivnykh parametrov teksta v ego pragmalingvisticheskoy interpretatsii. In Germanistika: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya: tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati professora O.I. Moskal'skoy. 24-25 maya 2004 g. Moscow: MGLU, 2004. P. 29-31.
Fateeva, N.A. Intertekst v mire tekstov. Kontrapunkt intertekstual'nosti. Moscow: KomKniga, 2007.
Milostivaja, A. (2010). Text als pragmasynergetische Kommunikationsform. Aspekte der Sprachwissenschaft: Linguistik-Tage Jena. 18. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft fur Sprache und Sprachen e.V. Hamburg, Verlag Dr. Kovac, S. 191-201.
Pages: 115-124