TECHNIQUES OF SEMANTIC CONSTRUCT DISCRETION AND OBJECTIVATION IN THE LIGHT OF REALIZATION AND INTEGRATION

TECHNIQUES OF SEMANTIC CONSTRUCT DISCRETION AND OBJECTIVATION IN THE LIGHT OF REALIZATION AND INTEGRATION

Author:  S.N. Bredikhin, R.S. Alikaev

Affiliation:  North-Caucasus Federal University (Stavropol, Russia), Kabardino-Balkarian State University (Nalchik, Russia)

Abstract:  The article deals with a complex analysis of sense desobjectivation and objectivation techniques and strategies in acts of interpreting multidimensional sense constructions.Strategies and techniques of objectivation in the original text and desobjectivation within the framework of the recipient’s cognitive-value system for senses in the text are inseparably linked with the type of reflection at one or another layer of mental activity and make up a “three-layered” hierarchy:
sense desobjectivation and objectivation techniques and strategies for one or another speech unit;
technical means for desobjectivation of sense structure and integration into its conceptual content;
strategies and techniques related to interpretative activity as regards desobjectivation and sensing of the overall paradigm of text sense.
Hierarchically they are structured in such a way that each subsequent layer is significantly less rich in means and ways of desobjectivation. At the same time it has a wider range of speech and communicative units as decoding objects.
To specify a certain way of acting as regards both the produced text and the one in the process of verbalization one should define the hierarchy and sequence of actions in order to gain a generalized vision and provide some kind of integrity for the text. This is how arises an opportunity to avoid its “spreading” and a way to provide a certain type of desobjectivation and understanding which can be interpreted by a recipient.
The study of noematic structure as a quantum sense hierarchy at every layer turns to be reasonable within philological phenomenological hermeneutics as well, in case schemes of acting with text reality are employed. It prevents us from slipping into component analysis, it can be reinforced by amalgamated elements – metaunits.
The text itself as a multidimensional sense structure which is designed and considered in a particular semiosis generates, objectivates and re-objectivates ever new latent senses contained in the paradigmatic language texture on the basis of noematic hierarchical structure.

Keywords:  sense objectivation, semantic superstructure transformation, phenomenological reflection, meta-units of realization, reflexive reality, text reality, hierarchy of realization strategies

References: 
Alikaev, R.S. & Alikaeva, M.R. (2008). Osobennosti prezentatsii razlichnykh tipov semantiko-sintaksicheskikh universaliy v nauchnom tekste. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Yazykoznanie, 1, 78-83.
Alikaev, R.S. (2013). Yazyk v filosofskoy kontseptsii G.V. Leybnitsa. Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoy lingvistiki, 15, 18-24.
Bogin, G.I. (1993). Substantsial'naya storona ponimaniya teksta. Tver'.
Borukhov, B.L. (1991). Zerkal'naya metafora v istorii kul'tury. In Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Kul'turnye kontsepty (pp. 109-117). Moscow: Nauka.
Bredikhin, S.N. (2013). Lingvokul'turologicheskiy aspekt smysloporozhdeniya na grammaticheskom urovne. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 3-1, 29-33.
Bredikhin, S.N. (2013a). Ierarkhicheskaya noematicheskaya superstruktura vs. freym v smysloporozhdenii kontseptual'nykh ponyatiy. Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki, 2, 117-129.
Bredikhin, S.N. (2014). Noematicheskaya struktura smysloporozhdeniya v filosofskom dis-kurse: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Nal'chik.
Bredikhin, S.N. (2014a). Transformatsii v rechevom potoke: proizvodstvo smyslov i upravlenie derivatsionnymi modelyami. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, 1, 115-124.
Vezhbitskaya, A. (1996). Yazyk. Kul'tura. Poznanie: per. s angl., otv. red. M.A. Krongauz, vstupit. st. E.V. Paduchevoy. Moscow: Russkie slovari.
Shchedrovitskiy, G.P. (1995). Smysl i znachenie. Izbrannye trudy. Moscow: Shk. kul't. polit.
Fillmore, C.J. (1982). Frame semantics (pp. 111-137). Seoul: SPH.
Lynge, J. (1994). Rules, language games and the autonomy of understanding. Oslo. Univ. of Oslo.
Stanley, J. (2000). Context and Logical Form. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 391-424.

Pages:  123-128