TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERPRETATION THEORY

TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERPRETATION THEORY

Author:  A.L. Sharandin

Affiliation:  Derzhavin Tambov State University

Abstract:  Both interpretation and reflection are viewed as cognitive properties of human mind and the main functions of language. Knowledge is traditionally defined as a person’s cognitive activity. Interpretation (alongside with reflection) represented in the system of cognition, includes life, art and scientific knowledge.
The author examines the results of the interpretative function of the language interacted with knowledge representation which reflect the peculiarities of conceptualizing and categorizing the world in language.
Life knowledge mirrors the rational world interpretation coloured with emotion and assessment. Religious knowledge – the irrational interpretation enriched with heart-and-soul attachment to what a human creature believes in. In art knowledge the interpretational potential appears the richest since it is embedded in the author’s individual, often whimsical, world perception. Interpretation of scientific knowledge realizes logic and reason which permit describing the subject matter of interpretation as true and real.
The author defines the interpretational differences in language semantics of a word and its forms from the point of view of knowledge formed as a result of conceptualization and being in urgent need in communication.

Keywords:  consciousness, comprehension, reflection, interpretation, knowledge, types of knowledge,
linguistic representation

References:  Boldyrev N.N. Aktual'nye zadachi kognitivnoy lingvistiki na sovremennom etape //
Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2013. № 1. S. 5-13.
Boldyrev N.N. Antropotsentricheskaya sushchnost' yazyka v ego funktsiyakh, edinitsakh i kategoriyakh // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2015.
№ 1. S. 5-12.
Bondarko A.V. K probleme sootnosheniya universal'nykh i idioetnicheskikh aspektov semantiki: interpretatsionnyy komponent grammaticheskikh znacheniy // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1992. № 3. S. 5-20.
Vinogradov V.V. Stilistika. Teoriya poeticheskoy rechi. Poetika. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1963.
Kazarin Yu.V. Poeticheskiy tekst kak sistema. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999.
Karaulov Yu.N., Filippovich Yu.N. Lingvokul'turnoe soznanie russkoy yazykovoy lichnosti. Modelirovanie sostoyaniya i funktsionirovaniya. M.: Azbukovnik, 2009.
Kubryakova E.S. Yazyk i znanie. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004.
KSKT – Kubryakova E.S., Dem'yankov V.Z., Pankrats Yu.G., Luzina L.G. Kratkiy slovar' kognitivnykh terminov. M.: IYa RAN, 1996.
Mechkovskaya N.B. Sotsial'naya lingvistika. M.: Aspekt Press, 1996.
Mikeshina L.A. Filosofiya poznaniya: Problemy epistemologii gumanitarnogo znaniya. M., 2008. URL: http://ideashistory.org.ru/pdfs/lamphpozn
Raspopov I.P. O preemstvennosti v prepo-davanii russkogo yazyka v shkole i vuze // Shkol'-naya i nauchnaya grammatika. Voronezh: VGU, 1977. S. 3-8.
Rudelev V.G. Poeziya i antipoeziya // Kredo. № 2-3. Tambov: TGU, 1996.
Filosofiya – Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / pod redaktsiey A.A. Ivina. M.: Gardariki. 2004. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/455
FES – Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1983.
Sharandin A.L. Oppozitivnye otnosheniya v sisteme znaniy // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2008. № 3. S. 75-89.
Sharandin A.L. Slovo v aspekte soznaniya, semiotiki, yazyka i kommunikatsii // Slavyanskiy mir: Dukhovnye traditsii i slovesnost'. Vyp. 4. Tambov: TGU, 2013. S. 178-184.
Sharandin A.L. Slovo i formy slova: derivatsionnye tipy, lingvisticheskaya znachimost' i funktsii // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2016. № 3. S. 207-213.

Pages:  10-18