SEMANTIC-PRAGMATIC POTENTIAL OF TERM IN THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL DIMENSION

SEMANTIC-PRAGMATIC POTENTIAL OF TERM IN THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL DIMENSION

Author:  N.A. Mishankina

Affiliation:  Tomsk Polytechnic University

Abstract:  The article discusses the semantic-pragmatic structure of the metaphorical term. It is regarded as a basic property that defines the epistemological potential. The purpose of the article is to identify the parameters of the metaphorical term semantic and pragmatic organization.

The methodology of the research is based on Lakoff and Johnson’s theory of conceptual metaphor where the metaphor is a cognitive activity associated with analogy processes. Analysis of metaphorical terminology of different scientific fields has shown that metaphorical term formation causes the formation of a pragmatic component. That is evidenced by such semantic parameters as the focus on epistemological “comfort” - relying on well-known structures of knowledge; teleological motivation – the author’s concept of the research subject; culturally and linguistically-based epistemological tradition that defines the standard models of semantics organization in the processes of epistemological semiosis in terminological systems formation.

The results of the research can be used in applied research of term systems, terminological thesaurus modeling, including bilingual thesauruses.

Keywords:  language of science, semantics, pragmatics, metaphorical term, conceptual metaphor, epistemological potential

References:  Boldyrev N.N., Dubrovskaya O.G. O formirovanii sotsiokul'turnoy spetsifiki diskursa // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2015. № 3. S. 14-25.
Vinokur G.O. O nekotorykh yavleniyakh slovoobrazovaniya v russkoy tekhnicheskoy terminologii // Trudy MIFLI. 1939. T. 5. S. 3-54.
Volodina M.V. Kognitivno-informatsion-naya priroda termina i terminologicheskaya nominatsiya: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. M., 1998.
Galkina O.V. Metafora kak instrument poznaniya. Na materiale terminov-metafor komp'yuternogo interfeysa: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Tver', 2004.
Gvishiani N.B. Yazyk nauchnogo obshcheniya (voprosy metodologii). M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1986.
Gusev S.S. Nauka i metafora. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1984.
Deeva A.I.  Natsional'naya spetsifika metaforicheskogo modelirovaniya tekhnicheskikh terminologicheskikh sistem (na materiale russkoy neftegazovoy terminologii): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Tomsk, 2015.
D'yachenko A.P. Metafory i terminologicheski ustoychivye vyrazheniya v meditsine: slovar'-spravochnik. Minsk: Novoe znanie, 2003.
Zubkova O.S.Lingvosemiotika professional'noy metafory: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Kursk, 2011.
Kandelaki T.L. Semantika i motivirovannost' terminov. M.: Nauka, 1977.
Kapanadze L.A. O ponyatiyakh «termin» i «terminologiya» // Razvitie leksiki sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1965.
Kozhina M.N. Stilistika russkogo yazyka. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1993.
Kornilov O.A. Yazykovye kartiny mira kak proizvodnye natsional'nykh mentalitetov. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1999.
Krasil'nikova L.V. Zhanr nauchnoy retsen-zii: semantika i pragmatika. M.: Dialog-MGU, 1999.
Kuliev G.G. Metafora i nauchnoe poznanie. Baku: Elm, 1987.
Lakoff D., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004.
Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1985.
Leychik V.M. Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktura. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2007.
Makarov M.L. Osnovy teorii diskursa. M.: ITDGK «Gnozis», 2003.
Mishankina N.A. Metafora v nauke: para-doks ili norma? Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo gos. un-ta, 2010.
Mishankina N.A. Metafora v terminologicheskikh sistemakh: funktsii i modeli // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. 2012. № 4 (20). S. 32-45.
Mishankina N.A. Gnoseologicheskie universalii russkoy nauchnoy kartiny mira: transformatsiya metaforicheskoy modeli // «Ya predana slovam, ikh sochetan'yam v perelivakh rechi…»: Problemy interpretatsionnoy lingvistiki: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGPU, 2014. S. 16-26.
Mishankina N.A., Rakhimova A.R. Metaforicheskoe modelirovanie struktury psikhiki cheloveka v nauchnom psikhologicheskom diskurse // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. 2015. № 3 (35). C. 57-72.
Mishlanova S.L. Kognitivno-diskursivnyy analiz retseptsii spetsial'nogo znaniya // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Humanitates. 2011. № 1. S. 96-102.
Natsional'nyy korpus russkogo yazyka. URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru
Nechaeva N.A. Informatsionno-ponyatiynaya struktura terminologii // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2010. № 1. S. 112-115.
Nikitina S.E. Semanticheskiy analiz yazyka nauki: na materiale lingvistiki. 2-e. izd. M.: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2010.
Ovsyannikova V.V. Metaforicheskie modeli
v nauchnom geologicheskom diskurse: avtoref.
dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Tomsk, 2010.
Panasenko E.A. Metaforicheskoe modelirovanie «tekhnologii»: dominiruyushchie modeli (na materiale informatsionnykh, bio- i nanotekhnologiy) // Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 2. S. 299-303.
Petrov V.V. Nauchnye metafory: priroda
i mekhanizm funktsionirovaniya // Filosofskie osnovaniya nauchnoy teorii. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1985. S. 196-200.
Prokhorova V.N. Russkaya terminologiya (leksiko-semanticheskoe obrazovanie). M.: MGU, filologicheskiy fakul'tet, 1996.
Rezanova Z.I. Metafora v lingvisticheskom tekste: tipy funktsionirovaniya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. 2007. № 1. S. 18-29.
Rezanova Z.I., Mishankina N.A., Katunin D.A. Metaforicheskiy fragment russkoy yazykovoy kartiny mira: klyuchevye kontsepty. Voronezh, 2003. Ch. 1.
Silant'ev I.V. Semantika metafory
v yazyke nauki // Kritika i semiotika. 2012. № 2 (17). S. 200-212.
Tutner G.B. Pragmatika // Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. M.: «Ka-non+»; ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009.
Khizhnyak S.P. Kognitivnaya problematika
v obshchey teorii termina. Saratov: ITs «Nauka», 2016.
Khodakova A.G. Sistemnaya semantika termina: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Tula, 2010.
Chernyavskaya V.E. Interpretatsiya nauchnogo teksta. M.: KomKniga, 2006.
Chudinov A.P. Rossiya v metaforicheskom zerkale: Kognitivnoe issledovanie politicheskoy metafory (1991–2000). Ekaterinburg: Ural. gos. ped. un-t, 2001.
Ankersmit F. History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. University of California Press, 1994.
Ankersmit F. Narrative Logic: A Semantic Analyses of the Historian Language. The Hague, 1983.
Boyd R. Metaphor and Theory Change: What is “Metaphor” a Metaphor for? // Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: University Press, 1993. P. 481-533.
Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. N.Y.: Basic Books, 2002.
Kuhn T.S. Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1979. P. 409-419.
Lakoff G., Fauconnier G. On Metaphor and Blending // Cognitive Semiotics. V. 5. No. 1-2. Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. P. 393-399.
Mishankina N.A., Deeva A.I. Lingvocognitive Specificity of Metaphorical Modeling in Russian Oil and Gas Terminology // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. V. 215. P. 293-300.
Ortega-y-Gasset J. Las dos grandesmetáforas. In: Ortega-y-Gasset J. Obras Completes. Tomo II, Madrid, 1966. P. 387-400.

Pages:  123-130