CATEGORICAL DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC AND EVERYDAY KNOWLEDGE

CATEGORICAL DIVISION OF SCIENTIFIC AND EVERYDAY KNOWLEDGE

Author:  1 - A.M. Klyoster, 2 - N.Y. Shnyakina

Affiliation:  1 - Omsk State Technical University, 2 - Omsk State Pedagogical University

Abstract:  In cognitive linguistics the language is viewed as objectified human knowledge about the reality. The article considers the forms of categorical division of scientific and everyday knowledge. On a material of the German language the authors study a dynamic frame as one of the types of mental representations.
Dynamic frame is a typical form of storing information about a cognitive situation. This structure includes some significant semantic coordinates (categories) named “top slots” and related to the typical situation, on the one hand, and “terminal slots”, that describe the actual situation, on the other hand.
The common features in structuring knowledge of different types is the evidence of common categorical net. The most important categorical nodes in the everyday knowledge are subject, object, action, time, space and reaction. In the scientific discourse the most objectified structures are instrument, subject and object. The difference consists in the verbalization of these significant categorical nodes.

Keywords:  dynamic frame, category, categorical net, everyday knowledge, scientific knowledge, top slot, terminal slot.

References:  Apresyan Yu.D. Deyksis v leksike i grammatike i naivnaya model' mira // Semiotika i informatika. 1986. Vyp. 28. S. 5-33.
Boldyrev N.N. Otrazhenie prostranstva deyatelya i prostranstva nablyudatelya v vyskazyvanii // Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Yazyki prostranstv. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 2000.
S. 212-216.
Boldyrev N.N. Kognitivnaya semantika. Tambov: Izd-vo Tamb. un-ta, 2001.
Bondarko A.V. K voprosu o pertseptivnosti // Sokrovennye smysly: Slovo. Tekst. Kul'tura. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004. S. 276-282.
Golovanova E.I. Professional'nyy diskurs, subdiskurs, zhanr professional'noy kommunikatsii: sootnoshenie ponyatiy // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 1 (292). S. 32-35.
Deyk van T.A. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya. M.: Progress, 1989.
Dzhonson-Lerd P.N. Mental'nye modeli // Kognitivnye issledovaniya v yazykovedenii i zarubezhnoy psikhologii. Barnaul: Alt. gos. un-t, 2001. S. 148-149.
Zarudneva E.A. Komparativnye konstruktsii v lingvokognitivnom aspekte: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Krasnodar, 2007.
Karaulov Yu.N. Lingvisticheskoe konstruirovanie i tezaurus literaturnogo yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1981.
Kasavin I.T. Postigaya mnogoobrazie razuma (Vmesto vvedeniya) // Zabluzhdayushchiysya razum?: Mnogoobrazie vnenauchnogo znaniya. M.: Politizdat, 1990. S. 5-28.
Klester A.M. Zhanrovaya spetsifika professional'nogo diskursa // Sovremennaya filologiya: teoriya i praktika: materialy XIX mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Nauchno-informatsionnyy izdatel'skiy tsentr «Institut strategicheskikh issledovaniy». M., 2015. S. 80-82.
Klester A.M. Freymovoe predstavlenie znaniy v kognitivnom terminovedenii // Dinamika sistem, mekhanizmov i mashin. 2012. № 4.
S. 153-155.
Kolshanskiy G.V. Logika i struktura yazyka. M.: Vyssh. shkola, 1965.
Kravchenko A.V. Yavlyaetsya li yazyk reprezentatsionnoy sistemoy? // Studia Linguistica Cognitiva. Yazyk i poznanie: Metodologicheskie problemy
i perspektivy. M.: Gnozis, 2006. Vyp. 1. S. 135-156.

Kruchinkina N.D. Kognitivnyy i yazykovoy aspekty formirovaniya sobytiynykh kontseptov // Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. 2010. Vyp. 2. S. 27-33.
Kubryakova E.S. Rol' slovoobrazovaniya
v formirovanii yazykovoy kartiny mira // Rol' chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: Yazyk i kartina mira. M., 1988. S. 141-172.
Kubryakova E.S. Freym // Kratkiy slovar' kognitivnykh terminov / sost. E.S. Kubryakova, V.Z. Dem'yankov, Yu.G. Pankrats, L.G. Luzina. M.: Filol. f-t MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova. 1997. S. 187-189.
Kubryakova E.S. Glagoly deystviya cherez ikh kognitivnye kharakteristiki // Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Izbrannoe. 1988-1995. M.: Indrik, 2003. S. 439-446.
Kubryakova E.S., Dem'yankov V.Z. K probleme mental'nykh reprezentatsiy // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. M.: Institut yazykoznaniya; Tambov: Tambovskiy gos. un-t im. G.R. Derzhavina, 2007. № 4. S. 8-16.
Luk'yanchenko E.A. K voprosu ponimaniya mental'noy reprezentatsii // Vestnik MGIMO – Universiteta. 2013. № 2. S. 167-169.
Pavilenis R.I. Problema smysla: sovremennyy logiko-filosofskiy analiz yazyka. M.: Mysl', 1983.
Pechetova N.Yu. Interpretatsiya sobytiynogo kontsepta v mediatekste // Vestnik Severo-Vos-tochnogo federal'nogo universiteta im. M.K. Amo-sova. 2010. № 2. T. 7. S. 144-149.
Revina Yu.N. Freymovaya struktura avtomobil'noy terminologii nemetskogo yazyka // Dinamika sistem, mekhanizmov i mashin. 2012. № 4. S. 161-164.
Tikhonova I.B. Osobennosti freymovogo analiza terminosistemy neftepererabotki
v angliyskom yazyke // Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2011. T. 16. № 3. S. 713-715.
Fedorova M.A. Zhanrovyy podkhod k razvitiyu kul'tury nauchnoy rechi // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. 2014. № 3 (129). S. 101-104.
Fedotova E.A. Reprezentatsiya spetsial'nogo znaniya v tekstakh «bezopasnost' proizvodstva
i tekhnologicheskikh protsessov» // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2011. № 1. S. 87-91.
Fillmor Ch. Delo o padezhe // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 10. M.: Progress, 1981. S. 369-495.
Fillmor Ch. Freymy i semantika ponimaniya // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. 23. M.: Progress, 1988. S. 52-92.
Furs L.A. Sintaksicheski reprezentiruemye kontsepty: avtoref. dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Tambov, 2004.
Khomyakova E.G. Kognitivno-informatsion-naya situatsiya kak instrument issledovaniya poznavatel'noy funktsii yazyka // Pertseptsiya. Refleksiya. Yazyk. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2010. S. 236-250.
Shnyakina N.Yu. (a) Modelirovanie situatsii poznaniya zapakha (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka) // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika. 2014. T. 11. № 2. S. 52-61.
Shnyakina N.Yu. (b) Osobennosti vyrazheniya reaktsii cheloveka na zapakhi (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka) // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. 2014.
№ 4. S. 202-208.
Shnyakina N.Yu. Etapy modelirovaniya sobytiynogo kontsepta (na primere verbalizovannoy situatsii poznaniya zapakha) // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. № 2. URL: http://www.science-education.ru/122-21340.
Shumaylova M.S. Freymovoe predstavlenie nemetskoy terminologii interneta // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial'nye, gumanitarnye, mediko-biolo-gicheskie nauki. 2014. T. 16. № 2-2. S. 447-453.
Yakovleva E.S. Fragmenty russkoy yazykovoy kartiny mira (modeli prostranstva, vremeni
i vospriyatiya). M.: Gnozis, 1994.
Charwat Hans Jürgen: Lexikon der Mensch- Maschine- Kommunikation. – 2., verb. Auflage. München; Wien: Oldenbourg, 1994.
Galich G.G., Shnyakina N.J. Categories of immaterial objects in mind and language // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015. Vol. 206.
P. 30-35.
Jourdain St., Smets F. Chaos in den Trümmern von Port-au-Prince. URL: http://www.lr-online.de/nachrichten/Tagesthemen-Chaos-in-den-Truemmern-von-Port-au-Prince;art1065,2800212
Kintsch W. The representation of meaning in memory. N.Y.: Halsted Press, 1974.
Klyoster A., Galich G. The fragmentation of professional discourse // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015. Vol. 206. P. 56-61.
Minsky M.L. Frame theory // P.N. Johnson-Laird and P.C.Wason, Thinking: Reasings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. P. 355-376.
Rumelhart D.E. Schemata: the building blocks of cognition // In R.J. Spiro etal. (eds). Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1980.
Schank R. C., Abelson R. P. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.
Ulrich B. Der wankende Staat. URL: http://www.wallstreet-online.de/diskussion/500-beitraege/985197-1-500/der-wankende-staat-oder-auch-es-ist-5-vor-12#beitrag_16784682

For citation:  Klyoster, A. M., & Shnyakina, N. Y. (2018). Categorical division of scientific and everyday knowledge. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 1, 144-150. (In Russ.).

Pages:  144-150