PERCEPTUAL “PROGRAMMING” OF LANGUAGE MEANING: METHODOLOGY AND BASIC RESULTS

PERCEPTUAL “PROGRAMMING” OF LANGUAGE MEANING: METHODOLOGY AND BASIC RESULTS

Author:  I.V. Zykova

Affiliation:  Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract:  The present paper dwells on the problem of the interplay between perceptual and linguistic processes in semantics and aims at exploring the ways perceptual experience influences the construction of language meaning. The starting point of the research is the assumption about the existence of a certain algorithm in accordance with which the human perceptual experience is processed and transformed into the content of language signs.
To test this hypothesis, a representative corpus of English and Russian phraseological units (more than 3,000 units) is analyzed. The analysis carried out is based on the approaches to perception developed in the works by B.G. Anan’ev, M.I. Sechenov, Ch. Sherrington and on information about perception presented in modern dictionaries on psychology, physiology and philosophy, and, on the linguistic side, – on the theory of linguocultural modelling of phraseological meaning, on the current data obtained in the sphere of the theory of conceptual metaphor, the theory of embodied meaning, and the theory of linguistic synesthesia.
The investigation helps to bring out the links of meanings of the phraseological signs under consideration with various kinds of perception, i.e. exteroception, proprioception, interoception, and nociception. According to the research findings, traces of perceptual experience can be detected on all main levels of the phraseological meaning (i.e. the deep level and the surface level). Various perceptual sensations serve as sources of the formation, first and foremost, of elementary constituents in the conceptual foundations of meanings of the phraseological units in question, then – they help to shape phraseological images, and, finally, the semantic components of their semantic structure.
In general, the analysis performed offers further evidence of the key role of human perceptual (embodied) experience in language meaning construal. It shows that perception, being a very complex system of mastering the world, not only “launches” the process of forming a certain meaning, but “programs” a particular way of its development.

Keywords:  perception, sensations, language meaning, embodied meaning, phraseological image,
macro-metaphorical conceptual model.

References:  Аnan'ev B.G. Teoriya oshhushhenij. M.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1961.
Аnan'ev B.G. O problemakh sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya. 2-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2001.
Аpresyan YU.D. Izbrannye trudy. T. 2. Integral'noe opisanie yazyka i sistemnaya leksikografiya. M.: YAzyki russkoj kul'tury, 1995.
ZHinkin N.I. Rech' kak provodnik informatsii. M.: Nauka, 1982.
Zalevskaya А.А. CHto tam – za slovom? Voprosy interfejsnoj teorii znacheniya slova. M.: Direkt-Media, 2014.
Zykova I.V. Kontseptosfera kul'tury
i frazeologiya: Teoriya i metody lingvokul'turologicheskogo izucheniya. M.: Lenand, 2015.
Zykova I.V. Pertseptsiya i frazeologicheskij znak v svete (psikho)lingvokul'turologicheskogo podkhoda // (Neo)psikholingvistika i (psikho)ling-vokul'turologiya: kollektivnaya monografiya. M.: Gnozis, 2017. S. 262-342.
LАYA – Logicheskij analiz yazyka. YAzyki dinamicheskogo mira / otv. red. N.D. Аrutyunova, I.B. SHatunovskij. Dubna: Mezhd. un-t prirody, obshhestva i cheloveka «Dubna», 1999.
LАYA – Logicheskij analiz yazyka. YAzyki prostranstv / otv. red. N.D. Аrutyunova, I.B. Levontina. M.: YAzyki russkoj kul'tury, 2000.
Luriya А.R. YAzyk i soznanie. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo un-ta, 1979.
Luriya А.R. EHtapy projdennogo puti. Nauchnaya avtobiografiya. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo gos. un-ta, 1982.
Myagkova E.YU. EHmotsional'no-chuvstvennyj komponent znacheniya slova: voprosy teorii:
dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. M.: Institut yazykoznaniya RАN, 2000.
Sechenov I.M. EHlementy mysli. M: Nauchnoe slovo, 1879.
Sechenov I.M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya.
T. 1: Fiziologiya i psikhologiya. M.: Izd-vo Аkademii nauk SSSR, 1952.
Teliya V.N. Konnotativnyj aspekt semantiki nominativnykh edinits. M.: Nauka, 1986.
Teliya V.N. Funktsional'no-parametriche-skaya model' znacheniya idiom // Leksikograficheskaya razrabotka frazeologizmov dlya slovarya razlichnykh tipov i dlya mashinnogo fonda russkogo yazyka (materialy k metodicheskoj shkole-semi-naru). M.: Аkademiya nauk SSSR, 1988. S. 18-35.
Cacciari C. Crossing the senses in metaphorical language // The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 425-443.
Cytowic R.E. Synesthesia: a union of the senses. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
Fauconnier G. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Gibbs R.W. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Marks L. Weak synesthesia in perception and language // Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 761-789.
Maurer D., Mondloch C. Neonatal synesthesia: A reevaluation // Synesthesia: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 193-213.
Mroczko-Wąsowicz А., Nikolić D. Colored Alphabets in Bilingual Synesthetes // Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 165-180.
OHS – Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Reuter K., Werning M, Kuchinke L, Cosentino E. Reading words hurts: the impact of pain sensitivity on people’s ratings of pain-related words // Language and cognition. 2017. 9. P. 553-567.
Ruiz de Mendoza F., Luzondo-Oyón A. Figurative and non-figurative motion in the expression of result in English // Language and cognition. 2016. 8. P. 32-58.
Ruthrof H. The body in language. USA: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.
Tyler A., Jan H. Be going to and will: talking about the future using embodied experience // Language and cognition. 2017. 9. P. 412-445.
Williams J.M. Synaesthetic adjectives: a possible law of semantic change // Language. 1976. 52(2). P. 461-478.
BPS – Bol'shoj psikhologicheskij slovar'. M.: Prajm-EVROZNАK, 2006.
BFSRYA – Bol'shoj frazeologicheskij slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: АST-Press Kniga, 2006.
NFS – Novejshij filosofskij slovar'. Minsk: Knizhnyj dom А.А. Gritsanov, 1999.
NFEH – Novaya filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya. M.: Mysl', 2001.
POS – Professional'noe obrazovanie. Slovar'. M.: NMTS SPO. S.M. Vishnyakova. 1999.
PEH – Psikhologicheskaya ehntsiklopediya. URL: http://enc-dic.com/enc_psy/ [dostup 18 avgusta 2017].
RFSS – Russkaya frazeologiya. Slovar'-spravochnik. M.: Russkij yazyk, 2001.
SEH – Sotsiologiya: EHntsiklopediya. Minsk: Interpresservis, Knizhnyj dom А.А. Gritsanov, 2003.
FSRLYA – Frazeologicheskij slovar'
russkogo literaturnogo yazyka. URL: https://phraseology.academic.ru/ [dostup 20 dekabrya 2017].
CHАFP – CHelovek: anatomiya, fiziologiya, psikhologiya. SPb.: Piter, 2011.
EHS – EHntsiklopediya sotsiologii (2009). URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/socio/ [dostup 28 dekabrya 2017].
EHSPP – EHntsiklopedicheskij slovar' po psikhologii i pedagogike (2013). URL: http://psychology_pedagogy.academic.ru/ [dostup
12 sentyabrya 2017].
EPs: Encyclopedia of Psychology: 8-Volume set. Oxford University Press; American Psychological Association, 2000.
NODE – The New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford/N.Y.: The Oxford University Press, 1999.

Acknowledgments:  The research is financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 14-28-00130 “Linguistic technologies in interaction of humanities” at the Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

For citation:  Zykova, I. V. (2018). Perceptual “programming” of language meaning: methodology and basic results. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 3, 27-40. (In Russ.).

Pages:  27-40