LINGUISTIC CREATIVITY PARAMETRIZATION IN CONTRASTING DISCOURSE TYPES: CINEMATIC DISCOURSE VS. DISCOURSE OF CHILDREN’S LITERATURE

LINGUISTIC CREATIVITY PARAMETRIZATION IN CONTRASTING DISCOURSE TYPES: CINEMATIC DISCOURSE VS. DISCOURSE OF CHILDREN’S LITERATURE

Author:  I.V. Zykova1, M.I. Kiose2

Affiliation:  1Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia) 2Moscow State Linguistic University (Moscow, Russia)

Abstract:  Linguistic creativity is considered an important means of discourse construal demonstrating the role of creative thought in communication and speech production.
This study examines various manifestations of linguistic creativity which suffice to construe contrasting discourse types – the cinematic discourse and the discourse of children’s literature. In the present work, we take a new slant on the problem of linguistic creativity assessment by distinguishing two forms of creativity, with the one attributed to discourse in general (macro discourse) and the other expressed in a particular discourse type (micro discourse).
At all levels of language there may be traced a definite set of linguistic means exhibiting different types of discourse norm violation, code-shifting, and stylistic variation which may serve as parameters of both macro and micro discourse linguistic creativity evaluation. We have elaborated the procedure of a complex qualitative and quantitative analysis of linguistic creativity aimed at defining its parametrical values in two discourse types with the idea of a further contrastive study.
The parametric annotation was carried out subsequently in two (equal in size) text fragments representing the cinematic discourse and the discourse of children’s literature, and was followed by the variance analysis which revealed the peculiar features of two discourse types construal in terms of their linguistic creativity potential.
The method elaborated and the results obtained help to step further towards the goal of understanding the interplay of cognition and discourse.

Keywords:  linguistic creativity, linguistic creativity parameters, cinematic discourse,
discourse of children’s literature, corpus annotation, analysis of variance.

References:  Apresyan Yu.D. Yazykovye anomalii: tipy i funktsii // Res Philologica: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. Pamyati akademika Georgiya Vladimirovicha Stepanova (1919–1986). M.; L.: Nauka, 1990. S. 50-71.
Arutyunova N.D. Anomalii
i yazyk (k probleme yazykovoy «kartiny mira») // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1987. № 3. S. 3-19.
Arutyunova N.D. Metafora i diskurs // Teoriya metafory. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 5-32.
Bezyae-
va M.G. Semantika kommunikativnogo urovnya zvuchashchego yazyka. Voleiz"yavlenie i vyrazhenie zhelaniya govoryashchego v russkom dialoge. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo un-ta, 2002.
Beloglazova E.V. Diskursnaya geterogennost' literatury dlya detey: kognitivnyy i lingvopragmaticheskiy aspekty: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. SPb., 2010.
Bryzgunova E.A. Zvuki i intonatsiya russkoy rechi. 3-e izd. pererab. M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1977.
Vyatkina S.V. (red.) Sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. SPb: SPbGU; M.: Akademiya, 2009.
Gabriel' D.A. Sredstva vyrazheniya yumora v literaturnykh i kinemato-graficheskikh rabotakh Vudi Allena: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. M.: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 2018.
Gak V.G. Yazykovye preobrazovaniya. M.: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1998.
Gridina T.A. Yazykovaya igra: stereotip
i tvorchestvo. Ekaterinburg: Ural. GPI, 1996.
Gridina T.A. Verbal'naya kreativnost' rebenka: ot istokov slovotvorchestva
k yazykovoy igre: monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy gos. ped. un-t, 2018.
Dem'yankov V.Z. Yazykovoe tvorchestvo i rechevaya kreativnost' // Yazyk kak mediator mezhdu znaniem i iskusstvom. M.: Azbukovnik, 2009. S. 11-19.
Dobrova G.R. Kreativnaya dominanta v formirovanii yazykovoy lichnosti // Lingvistika kreativa 4: kollektivnaya monografiya / pod red. T.A. Gridinoy. Ekaterinburg, 2018. S. 40-47.
Zaretskaya A.N. Osobennosti realizatsii podteksta
v kinodiskurse: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Chelyabinsk: Chelyab. gos. un-t, 2010.
Zykova I.V. Kontseptosfera kul'tury i frazeologiya: Teoriya i metody lingvokul'turologicheskogo izucheniya. M.: LENAND, 2015.
Zykova I.V. Metayazyk lingvokul'turologii: Konstanty i varianty. M.: Gnozis, 2017.
Zykova I.V. Code-switching kak kognitivnyy priem realizatsii lingvokreativnosti v komediynom kinodiskurse // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2019. Vyp. XXXVIII. S. 216-228.
Ivanov Vyach. Vs.
O vozdeystvii «esteticheskogo eksperimenta» Andreya Belogo (V. Khlebnikov, V. Mayakovskiy, M. Tsvetaeva, B. Pasternak) // Andrey Belyy. Problema tvorchestva. Stat'i. Vospominaniya. Publikatsii. M.: Sovetskiy pisatel', 1988. S. 338-366.
Il'yasova S.V., Amiri L.P. Yazykovaya igra v kommunikativnom prostranstve SMI i reklamy. 6-e izd., ster. M.: Flinta, 2018.
Iriskhanova O.K. Lingvokreativnye osnovaniya teorii nominalizatsii: dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. M., 2004.
Kazakova A.I. Osobennosti formirovaniya frazeologicheskoy semantiki v diskursivnom prostranstve otechestvennogo kinoiskusstva: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Astrakhan': Astrakhanskiy gos. un-t, 2014.
Kiose M.I. Faktory uspeshnoy interpretatsii koreferentnykh nepryamykh nominatsiy: kognitivnyy analiz – statistika – eksperiment // Voprosy
kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2018. № 3. S. 16-26.
DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-3-16-26
Kovtunova I.I. Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk: Poryadok slov
i aktual'noe chlenenie predlozheniya. M.: Prosve-shchenie, 1976.
Kodzasov S.V., Krivno-
va O.F. Obshchaya fonetika. M.: RGGU, 2001.
Kozhina N.M. Stilistika russkogo yazyka. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1977.
Koryachkina A.V. Angloyazychnyy khudozhestvennyy kinodiskurs i potentsial ego interpretativno-kommunikativnogo perevoda: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. SPb.: SPbGU, 2017.
Kubryakova E.S. Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya. Rol' yazyka v poznanii mira. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2004.
Lotman Yu.M. Semiotika kino i problemy kinoestetiki. Tallin: Eesti Raamat, 1973.
Nuriev V.N. Problema sintak-sicheskoy variativnosti pri izuchenii khudozhestvennogo perevoda // Grammaticheskie kategorii germanskikh yazykov v antropotsen-tricheskoy perspektive: kollektivnaya monografiya / otv. red. D.B. Nikulicheva. M.: Kantsler, 2017. S. 273-283.
Radbil' T.B. Yazykovye anomalii v khudozhestvennom tekste: Andrey Platonov i drugie. 2-e izd. stereotip. M.: Flinta, 2012.
Remchu-kova E.N. Kreativnyy potentsial russkoy grammatiki. M.: Librokom, 2016.
Slyshkin G.G., Efremova M.A. Kinotekst (opyt lingvokul'turologicheskogo analiza). M.: Vodoley Publishers, 2004.
Sokolova O.V. Tipologiya diskursov aktivnogo vozdeystviya: poeticheskiy avangard, reklama i PR. M.: Gnozis, 2014.
Stepanov Yu.S. TVORChESTVO. Vstupitel'noe slovo k Konferentsii 25 yanvarya 2008 g. // Tvorchestvo vne traditsionnykh klassifikatsiy gumanitarnykh nauk. M.; Kaluga, 2008.
Teliya V.N. Metafora v yazyke i tekste. M.: Nauka, 1990.
Feshchenko V.V. Yazyk kak tvorchestvo i tvorchestvo v yazyke: k istorii lingvisticheskoy idei // Kritika i semiotika. 2012. Vyp. 17. S. 84-94.
Tseytlin S.N. Yazyk i rebenok. Osvoenie rebenkom rodnogo yazyka. M.: Vlados, 2017.
Carter R. Language and creativity: the art of common talk. London: Routledge, 2004.
Gamble N. Exploring children’s literature: Reading with pleasure and purpose. London: SAGE publications, 2013.
Gardner H. Creativity lives and creative works: a synthetic scientific approach // R. Sternberg, T. Tardif (eds.). The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. P. 298-324.
Hunt P. Understanding children’s literature. London; N.Y.: Routledge, 2005.
Kerremans D. A web of new words. A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH, 2015.
Kidd D.K., Costano E. Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind // Science, 342 (6156), 2013. P. 377-380.
King G. Film comedy. Chippenham (Wiltshire): Antony Rowe Ltd, 2002.
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett B. (ed). Speech play: Research and resources for studying linguistic creativity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1976.
Langlotz A. Idiomatic creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.
Lesnik-Oberstein K. Children’s literature: Criticism and the fictional child. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Nikolayeva M. Children’s literature comes of age: Towards a new aesthetic. N.Y.: Garland, 1996.
Piazza R. The discourse of Italian cinema and beyond: Let cinema speak. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011.
Winter-Froemel E. Approaching wordplay // Crossing languages to play with words: multidisciplinary perspectives. Berlin; Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2016. P. 11-46.
Zipes J. Sticks and stones. The trouble-
some success of children’s literature from Slovenly Peter to Harry Potter. London; N.Y.: Routledge, 2001.

Acknowledgments:  The research is financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project №19-18-00040 and is carried out in the Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

For citation:  Zykova, I. V., Kiose, M. I. (2020). Linguistic creativity parametrization in contrasting discourse types: cinematic discourse vs. discourse of children’s literature. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 2, 26-40. (In Russ.).

Pages:  26-40