Author: V.I. Zabotkina, E.M. Pozdnyakova
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Abstract:
The article discusses the cognitive mechanisms underlying the creation of manipulative euphemisms; it presents the essence of those cognitive tools that are used by the media to manipulate the recipients, consuming their content.
The research tasks are: identification of the parameters enhancing the cognitive mechanism of reframing in relation to euphemisms; determining what part of the original meaning structure is inherited in a new creative meaning of the euphemism formation.
The methods used are: conceptual analysis, frame analysis, analysis of socio-cultural interpretant, principle of dynamic conceptual semantics.
As a result of the study, we obtained the data on how the process of reframing is carried out with euphemisms used for manipulation purposes. For its implementation, the cognitive mechanisms of analogy, conceptual deviation and conceptual blending are used, backstage cognition is activated. During reframing, the slots of the source frame are mapped onto the slots of the construed frame. Word or phrase representing the source frame profiles the conceptualization and triggers the set of target frame slots. In the case of using a euphemism for reframing, a contextually justified, but more neutral expression that does not carry negative conceptual attributes is chosen.
The results can be used in cognitive linguistics and journalism studies.
Keywords: euphemisms, mass communication media, manipulation, conceptual deviation, reframing.
References:
Болдырев Н.Н. Грамматические схемы вторичной интерпретации мира // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2021. № 4. С. 22-34. [Boldyrev N.N. Grammaticheskiye skhemy vtorichnoy interpretatsii mira // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki.2021. № 4. S. 22-34.]
Болдырев Н.Н., Дубровская О.Г. Социокультурный контекст интерпретации мира и формирования дискурса // Известия РАН. Серия литературы и языка. 2016. Т. 75. № 1. С. 29-39. [Boldyrev N.N., Dubrovskaya O.G. Sotsiokulturnyy kontekst interpretatsii mira i formirovaniya diskursa // Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 2016. T. 75. № 1. S. 29-39.]
Демьянков В.З. Языковая креативность в художественном творчестве // Труды ин-та русского языка имени В.В. Виноградова. 2016. № 7. С. 29-34. [Demyankov V.Z. Yazykovaya kreativnost v khudozhestvennom tvorchestve // Trudy in-ta russkogo yazyka imeni V.V.Vinogradova. 2016. № 7. S. 29-34.]
Демьянков В.З. Лингвокреативность в дискурсах о возможном и вероятном // Лингвокреативность в дискурсах разных типов: пределы и возможности. М.: РВалент, 2021. С. 21-99. [Demyankov V.Z. Lingvokreativnost v diskursakh o vozmozhnom i veroyatnom // Lingvokreativnost v diskursakh raznykh tipov: predely i vozmozhnosti. M.: RValent, 2021. S. 21-99.]
Заботкина В.И. Неологизация ментального лексикона: соотношение коммуникативных и когнитивных параметров // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2017. Вып. XXIX. С.71-79. [Zabotkina V.I. Neologizatsiya mentalnogo leksikona: sootnosheniye kommunikativnykh i kognitivnykh parametrov // Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka. 2017. Vyp. XXIX. S. 71-79.]
Заботкина В.И. Креативность в лексиконе: взаимодействие когниции и коммуникации // Язык. Культура. Перевод. Коммуникация: сб. научн. тр. Вып. 2. М.: «КДУ», «Университетская книга», 2018. С. 22-25. [Zabotkina V.I. Kreativnost′ v leksikone: vzaimodeystviye kognitsii i kommunikatsii // Yazyk. Kul′tura. Perevod. Kommunikatsiya: sb. nauchn. tr. Vyp. 2. M.: «KDU», «Universitetskaya kniga», 2018. S. 22-25.]
Заботкина В.И. Когнитивные основы лингвистической креативности // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2019. № XXXVIII. С. 208-216. [Zabotkina V.I. Kognitivnyye osnovy lingvisticheskoy kreativnosti // Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka. 2019. № XXXVIII. S. 208-216.]
Заботкина В.И., Боярская Е.Л. К вопросу о динамической концептуальной семантике: моделирование структуры концепта «преодоление» // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2020. Вып. XXXVIII. С. 208-216. [Zabotkina V.I., Boyarskaya E.L. K voprosu o dinamicheskoy kontseptualnoy semantike: modelirovaniye struktury kontsepta «preodoleniye» // Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka. 2020. Vyp. XXXVIII. S. 208-216.]
Кубрякова Е.С. Язык и знание: На пути получения знаний о языке: части речи с когнитивной точки зрения. Роль яз. в познании мира. М.: Яз. славян. культуры, 2004. [Kubryakova E.S. Yazyk i znaniye: Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya. Rol yaz. v poznanii mira. M.: Yaz. slavyan. kultury, 2004.]
Позднякова Е.М. Креативность действия в зеркале лингвокреативной деятельности человека // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2006. № 3. С. 43-49. [Pozdnyakova E.M. Kreativnost deystviya v zerkale lingvokreativnoy deyatelnosti cheloveka // Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki. 2006. № 3. S. 43-49.]
Carter R. Language and Creativity. The Art of Common Talk. London; N.Y.: Routledge, 2004.
Derrida J. Die Lehre Nietzsches und die Politik des Eigennamens // J. Derrida, F. Kittler: Nietzsche – Politik des Eigennamens. Wie man anschafft, wovon man spricht. Berlin, 2000.
Evans V. Figurative Language Understanding // Cognitive Linguistics. 2010. Vol. 21.4. P. 601-662.
Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. N.Y.: Basic Books, 2002.
Gruszka A., Necka E. Priming and Acceptance of Close and Remote Associations by Creative and Less Creative People // Creativity Research Journal.2002. No. 14 (2). P. 193-205.
King W. Woke Capitalism is a Smokescreen. URL: https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2021/12/19/woke-capitalism-is-a-smokescreen/ Accessed 15 May 2022.
Koestler A. The Act of Creation, London: Hutchinson, 1964.
Lakoff G., Turner M. More than cool reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Lakoff G. The ALL NEW. Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea Green Publishing White River Junction, Vermont, 2014. P. 18-19.
Locke J. Essay on Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
Mednick S.A. The associative basis of the creative process // Psychological Review. 1962. Vol. 69. P. 220-232.
Morrow D. Black Democrats Are Fighting Back Against ‘Woke’ Progressives. URL: https://www.newsweek.com/black-democrats-are-fighting-back-against-woke-progressives-opinion-1660583. Accessed 15 May 2022.
Peters M. Very Spatial and Capable Lethal Aid. URL: https://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/evasive/very-spatial-and-capable-lethal-aid/
Prato A. The Abuse of Words: the Case of Euphemism // American International Journal of Social Science. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 10-13.
Pozdnyakova E. Investigation into lingvocreativity as part of human creative activity research // 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scieintific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016. 2016. P. 563-570.
Sawyer R.K. Explaining creativity. The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press, 2006.
Thagard P., Terrence, T.C. The AHA! Experience: creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive science. 2010. 35 (1). P. 1-33.
Rossman E., Fink A. Do creative people use shorter associative pathways? Personality and Individual Differences. 2010. Vol. 49. Iss. 8. P. 891-895.
Stillman J. The CEOs of Microsoft and LinkedIn Agree: We're in the Middle of the Great Reshuffle, Not the Great Resignation //https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/great-resignation-microsoft-linkedin-satya-nadella.html Accessed 15 May 202.
“Reshuffle” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reshuffle. Accessed 15 May 2022.
“Resign” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/resign. Accessed 15 May 2022.
“Woke” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woke. Accessed 15 May 2022.
Acknowledgments: The research is financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 22-18-00594.
For citation: Zabotkina, V. I., & Pozdnyakova, E. M. (2022). Cognitive mechanisms of manipulative euphemizing. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 4, 55-64 (In Russ.).
Pages: 55-64