NOVEL METAPHOR RECOGNITION IN L1 AND L2 AS MEDIATED BY SYNTACTIC FOREGROUNDING: AN EYE MOVEMENT STUDY

NOVEL METAPHOR RECOGNITION IN L1 AND L2 AS MEDIATED BY SYNTACTIC FOREGROUNDING: AN EYE MOVEMENT STUDY

Author:  A.A. Rzheshevskaya, A.I. Izmalkova

Affiliation:  Moscow State Linguistic University

Abstract: 
The study explores gaze behavior in novel metaphor recognition in L1 and L2 as affected by the syntactic position of a metaphor; therefore, we test the contrastive role of syntactic foregrounding in information processing. Following cognitive linguistic theories of foregrounding [Talmy 2000; Iriskhanova 2014], we expect its effects on both gaze behavior and metaphor recognition in subject and predicate positions.
Following the theories exploring the role of cognitive mechanisms of analogical reasoning and associative fluency [Gentner & Bowdler 2008; Holyoak & Stamenković 2020] in L1 and L2 [Littlemore et al. 2011, Heredia and Cieślicka 2016], we expect differences in L1 and L2 participants in reading and recognition of novel metaphors. The results show that novel metaphor recognition in less foregrounded syntactic position is better in both L1 and L2, which might be explained by the fact that in syntactically foregrounded positions the participants were more likely to search for the source of metaphor, rather than for its target.
Additionally, we revealed significant differences in L1 and L2 gaze performance in mean fixation duration, which is higher in syntactically foregrounded position for L2, which might be explained by higher effects of syntactic foregrounding in L2.

Keywords:  novel metaphor, syntactic foregrounding, analogical reasoning, associative fluency, L1 and L2 information processing, oculographic experiment, gaze costs.

References:  Ashby J., Roncero C., de Almeida R., Agauas S. J. The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements // Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 1, 2017. P. 1-9.
Birch S. L., Albrecht J. E., Myers J. L. Syntactic focusing structures influence discourse processing // Discourse Processes, (30) 3, 2010. P. 285–304.
Carroll J. B. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Clifton Ch., Staub A. Syntactic influences on eye movements during reading. Oxford Handbook on Eye Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Fedorova O. Metod sintaksicheskogo praiminga v experimentalnoi lingvistike [Method of syntactical priming in experimental linguistics] // Rhema, 2, 2020. P. 92-120. (In Russ.)
Gentner D. Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy // Cognitive Science, Volume 7 (2). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 1983. P. 155-170.
Gentner D., Bowdle B. Metaphor as structure-mapping // The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 109-128.
Gibbs R. W., Matlock T. Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence / R. W. Gibbs (ed.) // The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 161-176.
Giora R. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Givoni S., Giora R. Salience and Defaultness / F. Liedtke & Tuchen A. (eds.) // Handbuch Pragmatik. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2018. P. 207-213.
Grady J.E. Metaphor / D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (eds.) // The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 188-213.
Guilford J. P. Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 1967. P. 3-14.
Heredia R. R., Cieślicka A. B. Metaphorical reference: An eye movement analysis of Spanish-English and English-Spanish bilingual readers // Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2016. Article 439.
Holyoak K. J. Analogical thinking and human intelligence / R.J. Sternberg (ed.) // Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Vol. 2 Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1984. P. 199-230.
Holyoak K. J., Stamenković D. Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence // Psychological Bulletin, 144, 2018. P. 641-671.
Iriskhanova O. Igry fokusa v yazyke: Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya [The games of focus in language: Semantics, syntax and pragmatics of focusing]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavianskoi Kultury, 2014. (In Russ.).
Jankowiak K., Rataj K., Naskręcki R. To electrify bilingualism: Electrophysiological insight into bilingual metaphor comprehension // PloS One, 12, 2017. Article e0175578.
Kiose M.I. The interplay of syntactic and lexical salience and its effect on default figurative responses // Studies in logic, grammar and rhetoric, 61 (74), 2020. P. 161-178.
Kiose M.I., Kharlamova T.G. Kognitivnye I glazodvigatel’nye tehniki kovnentsionalizatsii nepryamyh nominativnyk kompleksov [Cognitive and eye-movement techniques in indirect nominal groups entrenchment] // Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 2021. P. 5-16. (In Russ.)
Lakoff G., Turner M. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Littlemore J. Developing Metaphor Interpretation Strategies for Students of Economics: A Case Study // Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité, 2002. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/apliut/4119.
Littlemore J., Chen P. T., Koester A., Barnden J. Difficulties in metaphors comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English // Applied Linguistics, 32, 2011. P. 408-429.
Olkoniemi H., Ranta H., Kaakinen J.K. Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 2016. P. 433-450.
Pierce R. S., MacLaren R., Chiappe D. L. The role of working memory in the metaphor interference effect // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 2010. P. 400-404.
Pollio H., Smith M. Metaphoric Competence and Complex Human Problem Solving // Cognition and Figurative Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980. P. 365-392.
Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Two volumes. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.
Vaid J., López B. G., Martínez F. E. Linking the figurative to the creative: Bilinguals’ comprehension of metaphors, jokes, and remote associates / R. R. Heredia & A. B. Cieślicka (eds.) // Bilingual figurative language processing. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2015. P. 53-86.

For citation:  Rzheshevskaya, A. A.,  Izmalkova, A. I. Novel metaphor in L1 and L2 as mediated by syntactic foregrounding: an eye movement study. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 4, 83-91.

Pages:  83-91