REFLECTION ON POLITICAL ASPECT OF RAGE BAIT STRATEGY IN YOUTUBE BLOGGERS’ DISCOURSE

REFLECTION ON POLITICAL ASPECT OF RAGE BAIT STRATEGY IN YOUTUBE BLOGGERS’ DISCOURSE

Author:  E.V. Troshchenkova

Affiliation:  Saint Petersburg State University

Abstract: 
Rage bait as a strategy of provoking negative emotions for engagement has surged in relevance amid 2025’s social media dynamics. This study addresses its political dimension, analyzing how it is perceived by the online community as opposed to existing dictionary definitions of the phrase.

The research is based on a corpus of 8 YouTube videos (2024-2025, ~232 min total) by English-speaking influencers critiquing rage bait. Methods encompass using CST online tools for lemmatization of manually checked and pre-corrected transcripts (~19,929 words), AntConc for the analysis of words frequency, n-grams and collocations. The quantitative analysis is enriched by in-depth context analysis, allowing to clarify the semantics of linguistic units from the perspective of a particular blogger's vision, pay special attention to the interpretative and evaluative aspect, and determine at a deeper level, from the point of view of understanding integral text fragments, the features of the functional load of individual keywords and their semantic connections. Thus, a fragment of knowledge about rage bait as a popular communication practice in social media is modeled.

The results demonstrate rage bait’s dual nature: it is mainly profit-oriented, yet it may be politically charged, with right-wing dominating ideologies. This politically oriented rage bait fosters stereotyping of social groups and ideological polarization by using dehumanization of women, Black people, and minorities. However, it can also be used in building personal brands for politicians. The politically oriented rage bait strategy creates a specific trap: the ragebater benefits from any outcome – speaking out against their statements supports their dissemination, a lack of reaction can be perceived as tacit agreement with the essence of the messages and support for discriminatory ideas. For this reason, it is the politically oriented rage bait that receives the most negative assessment in the discussions.

Keywords:  medialinguistics, YouTube, rage bait, stereotyping of social groups,

creating a personal brand of a politician.

References:  Трощенкова Е.В. «Гонка вооружений» в общественно-политическом дискурсе: диалог новых медиа и их аудитории в когнитивном аспекте и роль исследователя // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2021. Вып. 4 (47). С. 520-527. [Troshchenkova E.V. «Gonka vooruzheniy» v obshchestvenno-politicheskom diskurse: dialog novykh media i ikh auditorii v kognitivnom aspekte i rol′ issledovatelya // Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka. 2021. Vyp. 4 (47). S. 520-527.] Трощенкова Е.В. Deinfluencing: обсуждение новой дискурсивной практики в англоязычных медиа // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2025. Вып. 2 (63). Ч. II. C. 245-249. [Troshchenkova E.V. Deinfluencing: obsuzhdeniye novoy diskursivnoy praktiki v angloyazychnykh media // Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka. 2025. Vyp. 2 (63). Ch. II. C. 245-249.] Merriam-Webster Dictionary. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.com/slang/rage-bait (дата обращения 16.09.25). Cambridge Free English Dictionary and Thesaurus https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rage-bait (дата обращения 5.01.26). Urban Dictionary. URL: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rage%20bait (дата обращения 16.09.25). Что такое показатели вовлеченности ER и ERR и как их рассчитать по формуле. URL: https://yandex.ru/adv/edu/materials/pokazateli-vovlechyennosti-er-err (дата обращения 5.01.26). Shin J., DeFelice Ch., Kim S. Emotion Sells: Rage Bait vs. Information Bait in Clickbait News Headlines on Social Media // Digital Journalism. 2025. Vol. 13. Iss. 7. P. 1271-1290. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2505566 (дата обращения 18.11.25). Babin B.J., Darden W.R. Babin L.A. Negative Emotions in Marketing Research: Affect or Artifact? // Journal of Business Research, Elsevier. 1998. Vol. 42(3). P. 271-285. Zheng M X. When and Why Negative Emotional Appeals Work in Advertising: A Review of Research // Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2020. Iss. 8. P. 7-16. Hastings G., Stead M., Webb J. Fear Appeals in Social Marketing: Strategic and Ethical Reasons for Concern // Psychology & Marketing. 2004. Iss. 21(11). P. 961-986. Türkel S., Misci Kip S., Yasdiman F.E. Use of Fear Appeal in Work Safety Messages: An Experimental Study // Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020. Iss. 3. P. 253-267. LaTour M.S., Snipes R.L., Bliss S.J. Don’t be afraid to use fear appeals: an experimental study // Journal of Advertising Research. 1996. Vol. 36. Iss. 2. P. 59-67. Arthur D., Quester P. The Ethicality of Using Fear for Social Advertising // Australasian Marketing Journal. 2003. Vol. 11. Iss. 1. P. 12-27. Coulter R.H., Pinto M.B. Guilt Appeals in Advertising: an Exploratory Study // Psychological Reports, 1991. Iss. 69. P. 375-385. Escalas J.E., Stern B.B. Sympathy and Empathy: Emotional Responses to Advertising Dramas // Journal of Consumer Research. 2003. Vol. 29. No. 4. P. 566-578. Andrade Ed.B., Cohen J.B. On the Consumption of Negative Feelings // Journal of Consumer Research. 2007. Vol. 34. Iss. 3. P. 283-300. Ilakkuvan V., Mitchell Turner, Cantrell M.J., Hair E., Vallone D. The Relationship Between Advertising-Induced Anger and Self-efficacy on Persuasive Outcomes // Family and Community Health. 2017. Vol. 40. No. 1, Advancing Theory in Health Promotion and Community Health. P. 72-80. Borawska A., Oleksy T., Maison D. Do negative emotions in social advertising really work? Confrontation of classic vs. EEG reaction toward advertising that promotes safe driving // PLoS One. 2020. May 15; 15(5). URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233036 (дата обращения 08.01.26).

For citation:  Troshchenkova, E. V. (2026). Reflection on political aspect of rage bait strategy in YouTube bloggers’ discourse. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 3, 45-55 (In Russ.).

Pages:  45-55